Cited by 72Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionGut microbiota and health

Methanogen genomics to discover targets for methane mitigation technologies and options for alternative H2 utilisation in the rumen.

Attwood, Graeme, McSweeney, Christopher·2008·Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Abstract

Reducing ruminant methane emissions is an important objective for ensuring the sustainability of ruminant-based agriculture. Methane is formed in the rumen by methanogens (part of the domain Archaea), mainly from H2 and CO2. Methanogens from a wide range of habitats are being genome-sequenced to gain a better understanding of their biology and, in particular, to identify targets for inhibition technologies for gut-associated methanogens. Genome comparisons are identifying common genes that define a methanogen, while gene differences are providing an insight into adaptations that allow methanogen survival and persistence under different environmental conditions. Within the rumen microbial food web, methanogens perform the beneficial task of removing H2, which allows reduced cofactors to be reoxidised and recycled, thereby enhancing the breakdown and fermentation of plant material. Therefore, rumen methane mitigation strategies need to consider alternative routes of H2 utilisation in the absence (or decreased levels) of methanogenesis to maintain rumen function. Two main alternatives are possible: enhancing rumen microorganisms that carry out reductive acetogenesis (combining CO2 and H2 to form acetate) or promotion of organisms that consume reducing equivalents during the conversion of metabolic intermediates (malate, fumarate and crotonate) into propionate and butyrate. A better understanding of the role and scale of methane oxidation in the rumen may also lead to future opti…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/ea07203

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Attwood, G., & McSweeney, C.
Affiliations
  • AgResearch (NZ)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Attwood, Graeme
Venue
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
Published
2008-01-02
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
28-37
ISSN
  • 0816-1089 (ISSN-L)
  • 1446-5574
OpenAlex
W2053529801
Cited by
72
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
methanogenic archaea, ruminant methane emissions, hydrogen consumption, reductive acetogenesis, methane oxidation, methanogenesis inhibition, archaea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review