Cited by 54Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and Health

Effects of tea saponin supplementation on nutrient digestibility, methanogenesis, and ruminal microbial flora in dorper crossbred ewe

Open access
Liu, Yunlong, Ma, Tao, Chen, Dandan, Zhang, Naifeng, Si, Bingwen, Deng, Kaidong, Tu, Yan, Diao, Qiyu·2019·Animals

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted using Dorper × thin-tailed Han crossbred ewes. In experiment 1, eighteen ewes were randomly assigned to two dietary treatments (a basal diet, or the same basal diet supplemented with 2.0 g tea saponin (TS)/head/day) to investigate the effects of TS supplementation on nutrient digestibility and methane emissions. In experiment 2, six ewes with ruminal cannulae were assigned to the same two dietary treatments as in experiment 1 to investigate the effects of TS supplementation on rumen fermentation and microbial flora. TS supplementation increased the apparent digestibility of organic matter (OM) (p = 0.001), nitrogen (N) (p = 0.036), neutral detergent fibre (NDF) (p = 0.001), and acid detergent fibre (ADF) (p < 0.001). Urinary N (p = 0.001) and fecal N (p = 0.036) output were reduced, and N retention (p = 0.001) and nitrogen retention/nitrogen intake (p = 0.001) were increased. Supplementary TS did not decrease absolute methane emissions (p = 0.519) but decreased methane emissions scaled to metabolic bodyweight by 8.80% (p = 0.006). Ammonia levels decreased (p < 0.001) and total volatile fatty acid levels increased (p = 0.018) in response to TS supplementation. The molar proportion of propionate increased (p = 0.007), whereas the acetate:propionate ratio decreased (p = 0.035). Supplementation with TS increased the population of Fibrobacter succinogenes (p = 0.019), but the population of protozoans tended to decrease (p = 0.054). Supplementation with TS effectively enhanced the apparent digestibility of OM, N, NDF, and ADF, and decreased methane emissions scaled to metabolic bodyweight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani9010029

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tea saponins effectively decrease N2 emission in sheep.

    “Furthermore, tea saponins have also been shown to effectively decrease N2 emission in sheep (157).”

    From Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis Through Exploiting Diet–Microbe Interaction (2020) · cites this paper as [157]

    The Simple Summary says tea saponin decreased nitrogen emissions, and Discussion §4.1 specifies decreased fecal and urinary nitrogen outputs in ewes. The paper does not establish a decrease in N₂ gas emissions; its measured gaseous emission was methane. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Tea saponin does not affect methanogens and the total bacterial population including R. flavefaciens, R. albus, and Butyrivibrio, but effectively reduces protozoa.

    “According to Liu et al. (157), tea saponin did not affect methanogens and the total bacterial population including R. flavefaciens R. albus, and Butyrivibrio. However, protozoa were effectively reduced in response to tea saponins.”

    From Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis Through Exploiting Diet–Microbe Interaction (2020) · cites this paper as [157]

    Results §3.3 reports no change in methanogens, total bacteria, R. flavefaciens, R. albus, or B. fibrisolvens. It reports only a tendency for protozoa to decrease (p = 0.054), so “effectively reduced” overstates that finding. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]NRC (Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants) Sheep, Goats, Cervids and New World Camelids National Academy Press Washington, DC, USA 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Ma, T., Chen, D., Zhang, N., Si, B., Deng, K., Tu, Y., & Diao, Q.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • Jinling Institute of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Tu, Yan
  • Diao, Qiyu
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-01-21
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
29
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910939695
Cited by
54
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • China Agriculture Research System (CARS-38)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41705129)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Animal Nutrition and Health
Keywords
tea saponin, nutrient digestibility, methane emissions, rumen fermentation, nitrogen retention, volatile fatty acids, Fibrobacter succinogenes, rumen protozoa, ammonia, feed additives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review