Cited by 84Human-Animal Interaction StudiesPhysical Activity and HealthUrban Transport and Accessibility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dog ownership and human health-related physical activity: an epidemiological study

Open access
Schofield, Grant, Mummery, Kerry, Steele, Rebekah·2005·Health Promotion Journal of Australia

Abstract

ISSUES ADDRESSED: The presence of a household dog may be of benefit to the health of the owners. One reason may be because of increased physical activity through regular dog walking. We sought to build on existing dog walking research with more detailed examination of the characteristics of both dogs and owners in relation to the owners' physical activity. METHODS: A population-based sample (n=1,237) of residents in central Queensland, Australia, were interviewed by computer-aided telephone interview to collect dog-related and physical activity data. RESULTS: Results showed that the simple presence of a household dog displayed no relationship to the acquisition of sufficient levels of physical activity in the overall population. This finding was mediated, in terms of recreational walking, by dog size, with respondents in households with medium or large dogs displaying significantly more minutes of recreational walking per week than those with small dogs, or no dog at all. In addition, respondents who were involved in walking their household's dog were more likely to meet established physical activity guidelines than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Dog ownership appears to offer the promise of affecting physical activity, but more work needs to be done to determine the contribution of ownership, dog type, and dog-walking frequency with regard to achieving health-related, physical activity guidelines.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/he05015

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In one Australian study, owners of large dogs spent more time walking than those who owned small dogs, and dog ownership per se was not associated with greater probability of obtaining recommended activity levels.

    “In one Australian study, owners of large dogs spent more time walking than those who owned small dogs, and dog ownership per se was not associated with greater probability of obtained recommended activity levels [49].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schofield, G., Mummery, K., & Steele, R.
Affiliations
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Venue
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Published
2005
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
15-19
ISSN
  • 1036-1073 (ISSN-L)
  • 2201-1617
OpenAlex
W2108340977
Cited by
84
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Promotion Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
dog ownership, dog walking, physical activity, recreational walking, dog size, physical activity guidelines, human-dog interaction, pet dogs, health benefits of pets
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Australia, Dogs, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review