The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dog ownership and human health-related physical activity: an epidemiological study
Open accessAbstract
ISSUES ADDRESSED: The presence of a household dog may be of benefit to the health of the owners. One reason may be because of increased physical activity through regular dog walking. We sought to build on existing dog walking research with more detailed examination of the characteristics of both dogs and owners in relation to the owners' physical activity. METHODS: A population-based sample (n=1,237) of residents in central Queensland, Australia, were interviewed by computer-aided telephone interview to collect dog-related and physical activity data. RESULTS: Results showed that the simple presence of a household dog displayed no relationship to the acquisition of sufficient levels of physical activity in the overall population. This finding was mediated, in terms of recreational walking, by dog size, with respondents in households with medium or large dogs displaying significantly more minutes of recreational walking per week than those with small dogs, or no dog at all. In addition, respondents who were involved in walking their household's dog were more likely to meet established physical activity guidelines than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Dog ownership appears to offer the promise of affecting physical activity, but more work needs to be done to determine the contribution of ownership, dog type, and dog-walking frequency with regard to achieving health-related, physical activity guidelines.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In one Australian study, owners of large dogs spent more time walking than those who owned small dogs, and dog ownership per se was not associated with greater probability of obtaining recommended activity levels.
“In one Australian study, owners of large dogs spent more time walking than those who owned small dogs, and dog ownership per se was not associated with greater probability of obtained recommended activity levels [49].”
From The Benefit of Pets and Animal-Assisted Therapy to the Health of Older Individuals (2014) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
Wilcox, S., Castro, C., King, A. C., Housemann, R., & Brownson, R. C. (2000) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.54.9.667 · Cited by 676
Headey, B. (1999) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1006892908532 · Cited by 201
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dog ownership and physical activity: a review of the evidence.
Christian, H. E., Westgarth, C., Bauman, A., Richards, E. A., Rhodes, R. E., Evenson, K. R., Mayer, J. A., & Thorpe, R. J. (2013) · Journal of Physical Activity and Health · doi:10.1123/jpah.10.5.750 · Cited by 316
Pet Ownership and Cardiovascular Risk: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Levine, G. N., Allen, K., Braun, L. T., Christian, H. E., Friedmann, E., Taubert, K. A., Thomas, S. A., Wells, D. L., & Lange, R. A. (2013) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31829201e1 · Cited by 299
The Benefit of Pets and Animal-Assisted Therapy to the Health of Older Individuals
Cherniack, E. P., & Cherniack, A. R. (2014) · Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research · doi:10.1155/2014/623203 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Schofield, G., Mummery, K., & Steele, R.
- Affiliations
- Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
- ORCID
- Schofield, Grant
- Venue
- Health Promotion Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-19
- ISSN
- 1036-1073 (ISSN-L)
- 2201-1617
- OpenAlex
- W2108340977
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Health Promotion Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Keywords
- dog ownership, dog walking, physical activity, recreational walking, dog size, physical activity guidelines, human-dog interaction, pet dogs, health benefits of pets
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Australia, Dogs, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Walking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review