Cited by 322DNA Repair MechanismsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFungal and yeast genetics research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks

Open access
Michel, Bénédicte, Grompone, Gianfranco, Florès, Maria-Jose, Bidnenko, Vladimir·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Impairment of replication fork progression is a serious threat to living organisms and a potential source of genome instability. Studies in prokaryotes have provided evidence that inactivated replication forks can restart by the reassembly of the replication machinery. Several strategies for the processing of inactivated replication forks before replisome reassembly have been described. Most of these require the action of recombination proteins, with different proteins being implicated, depending on the cause of fork arrest. The action of recombination proteins at blocked forks is not necessarily accompanied by a strand-exchange reaction and may prevent rather than repair fork breakage. These various restart pathways may reflect different structures at stalled forks. We review here the different strategies of fork processing elicited by different kinds of replication impairments in prokaryotes and the variety of roles played by recombination proteins in these processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0401586101

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 71 references

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Wang, T. C. & Smith, K. C. (1986) Mutat. Res. 165, 39–44.3510373
  2. 10.1093/genetics/166.4.1631 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–321 of 321

Metadata

Authors
Michel, B., Grompone, G., Florès, M.-J., & Bidnenko, V.
Affiliations
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • Laboratoire de Génétique Microbienne, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78352 Jouy en Josas Cedex, France
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-08-24
Volume
101
Issue
35
Pages
12783-12788
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2114809602
Cited by
322
References
71
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
replication fork restart, stalled replication forks, recombination proteins, genomic instability, strand exchange
MeSH terms
Bacteria, DNA, DNA Repair, DNA Replication, Mutation, DNA Gyrase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review