Cited by 102Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

A nontransgenic mouse model shows inducible amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide deposition and elucidates the role of apolipoprotein E in the amyloid cascade

Open access
Dolev, Iftach, Michaelson, Daniel M.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide, a major pathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD), undergoes a cascade of interactions resulting in the formation of soluble aggregates and their conversion in the brain to insoluble deposits and mature senile plaques. Furthermore, the apoE4 isoform of apolipoprotein E (apoE), which is the major genetic risk factor of AD, is associated with increased Aβ deposition. It is not known how the different Aβ aggregates in the amyloid cascade are formed, contribute to the pathogenesis of AD, or are affected by apoE4. To investigate the initial aggregation stages underlying the amyloid cascade in vivo and how apoE affects them, we examined the effects of prolonged inhibition and subsequent reactivation of the Aβ-degrading protease neprilysin on deposition, disaggregation, and fibrillization of Aβ in apoE-transgenic and control mice. In control mice, intracerebroventricular infusion of thiorphan, which inhibits neprilysin, induced Aβ42 and Aβ40 deposition and fibrillization. On termination of thiorphan treatment, the number of Aβ deposits decreased, whereas the fibrillar Aβ deposits were unaffected. Similar treatments in apoE-deficient mice and mice transgenic for human apoE4 or apoE3 revealed that apoE4 enhances specifically the nucleation and aggregation of immunopositive Aβ deposits and that reversible disaggregation of these deposits and their irreversible conversion to fibrillar deposits are stimulated similarly by the different apoE isoforms. Deposition of Aβ and its enhancement by apoE4 were accompanied by increased astrogliosis both far from and near the Aβ deposits, suggesting that astrogliosis might be triggered by both insoluble and soluble Aβ aggregates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0404458101

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies using transgenic mice that possess different human apoE transgenes also demonstrate an isoform-specific difference (E4>E3) in Aβ deposition.

    “Other studies using transgenic mice that possess different human apoE transgenes also demonstrate an isoform-specific difference (E4>E3) in Aβ deposition (Buttini et al., 2002; Dolev and Michaelson, 2004).”

    From The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as Dolev and Michaelson, 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [4]Lambert, M. P., Barlow, A. K., Chromy, B. A., Edwards, C., Freed, R., Liosatos, M., Morgan, T. E., Rozovsky, I., Trommer, B., Viola, K. L., et al. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6448-6453.
  2. [10]Gong, Y., Chang, L., Viola, K. L., Lacor, P. N., Lambert, M. P., Finch, C. E., Krafft, G. A. & Klein, W. L. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10417-10422.
  3. [14]Hsia, A. Y., Masliah, E., McConlogue, L., Yu, G. Q., Tatsuno, G., Hu, K., Kholodenko, D., Malenka, R. C., Nicoll, R. A. & Mucke, L. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3228-3233.
  4. [18]Corder, E. H., Saunders, A. M., Strittmatter, W. J., Schmechel, D. E., Gaskell, P. C., Small, G. W., Roses, A. D., Haines, J. L. & Pericak-Vance, M. A. (1993) Science 261, 921-923.
  5. [19]Saunders, A. M., Strittmatter, W. J., Schmechel, D., St. George-Hyslop, P. H., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Joo, S. H., Rosi, B. L., Gusella, J. F., CrapperMacLachlan, D. R., Alberts, M. J., et al. (1993) Neurology 43, 1467-1472.
  6. [21]Schmechel, D. E., Saunders, A. M., Strittmatter, W. J., Crain, B. J., Hulette, C. M., Joo, S. H., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Goldgaber, D. & Roses, A. D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9649-9653.
  7. [24]Holtzman, D. M., Bales, K. R., Tenkova, T., Fagan, A. M., Parsadanian, M., Sartorius, L. J., Mackey, B., Olney, J., McKeel, D., Wozniak, D., et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2892-2897.
  8. [28]Farris, W., Mansourian, S., Chang, Y., Lindsley, L., Eckman, E. A., Frosch, M. P., Eckman, C. B., Tanzi, R. E., Selkoe, D. J. & Guenette, S. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4162-4167.
  9. [32]Xu, P. T., Schmechel, D., Rothrock-Christian, T., Burkhart, D. S., Qiu, H. L., Popko, B., Sullivan, P., Maeda, N., Saunders, A. M., Roses, A. D., et al. (1996) Neurobiol. Dis. 3, 229-245.
  10. [42]Bales, K. R., Verina, T., Cummins, D. J., Du, Y., Dodel, R. C., Saura, J., Fishman, C. E., DeLong, C. A., Piccardo, P., Petegnief, V., et al. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 15233-15238.
  11. [44]Strittmatter, W. J., Weisgraber, K. H., Huang, D. Y., Dong, L. M., Salvesen, G. S., Pericak-Vance, M., Schmechel, D., Saunders, A. M., Goldgaber, D. & Roses, A. D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 8098-8102.
  12. [47]Evans, K. C., Berger, E. P., Cho, C. G., Weisgraber, K. H. & Lansbury, P. T., Jr. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 763-767.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dolev, I., & Michaelson, D. M.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-09-13
Volume
101
Issue
38
Pages
13909-13914
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2055425813
Cited by
102
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities
  • Tel Aviv University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
amyloid-beta, Alzheimer's disease, apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, amyloid hypothesis, neprilysin inhibition, thiorphan, amyloid-beta deposition, astrocyte activation, APOE isoforms
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Animals, Apolipoproteins E, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review