Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted mutagenesis using zinc-finger nucleases in Arabidopsis

Open access
Lloyd, Alan, Plaisier, Christopher L., Carroll, Dana, Drews, Gary N.·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Targeted mutagenesis is an essential tool of reverse genetics that could be used experimentally to investigate basic plant biology or modify crop plants for improvement of important agricultural traits. Although targeted mutagenesis is routine in several model organisms including yeast and mouse, efficient and widely usable methods to generate targeted modifications in plant genes are not currently available. In this study we investigated the efficacy of a targeted-mutagenesis approach based on zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs). In this procedure, ZFNs are used to generate double-strand breaks at specific genomic sites, and subsequent repair produces mutations at the break site. To determine whether ZFNs can cleave and induce mutations at specific sites within higher plant genomes, we introduced a construct carrying both a ZFN gene, driven by a heat-shock promoter, and its target into the Arabidopsis genome. Induction of ZFN expression by heat shock during seedling development resulted in mutations at the ZFN recognition sequence at frequencies as high as 0.2 mutations per target. Of 106 ZFN-induced mutations characterized, 83 (78%) were simple deletions of 1–52 bp (median of 4 bp), 14 (13%) were simple insertions of 1–4 bp, and 9 (8%) were deletions accompanied by insertions. In 10% of induced individuals, mutants were present in the subsequent generation, thus demonstrating efficient transmission of the ZFN-induced mutations. These data indicate that ZFNs can form the basis of a highly efficient method for targeted mutagenesis of plant genes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0409339102

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Lloyd, A., Plaisier, C. L., Carroll, D., & Drews, G. N.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-01-26
Volume
102
Issue
6
Pages
2232-2237
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1972933969
Cited by
417
References
4
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted mutagenesis using zinc-finger nucleases in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0409339102
The paper
Lloyd, A., Plaisier, C. L., Carroll, D., & Drews, G. N. (2005). Targeted mutagenesis using zinc-finger nucleases in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409339102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.