Cited by 219Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentPhonetics and Phonology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension

Open access
Farmer, Thomas A., Christiansen, Morten H., Monaghan, Padraic·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Since Saussure, the relationship between the sound and the meaning of words has been regarded as largely arbitrary. Here, however, we show that a probabilistic relationship exists between the sound of a word and its lexical category. Corpus analyses of nouns and verbs indicate that the phonological properties of the individual words in these two lexical categories form relatively separate and coherent clusters, with some nouns sounding more typical of the noun category than others and likewise for verbs. Additional analyses reveal that the phonological properties of nouns and verbs affect lexical access, and we also demonstrate the influence of such properties during the on-line processing of both simple unambiguous and syntactically ambiguous sentences. Thus, although the sound of a word may not provide cues to its specific meaning, phonological typicality, the degree to which the sound properties of an individual word are typical of other words in its lexical category, affects both word- and sentence-level language processing. The findings are consistent with a perspective on language comprehension in which sensitivity to multiple syntactic constraints in adulthood emerges as a product of language-development processes that are driven by the integration of multiple cues to linguistic structure, including phonological typicality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0602173103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When a sentential context conferred a strong expectation for a word of a given grammatical category, participants were slower to read the incoming noun when its form was atypical with respect to other words in the expected category.

    “Farmer et al. (2006) demonstrated that when a sentential context conferred a strong expectation for a word of a given grammatical category (as in The child saved the … , where a noun is strongly expected), participants were slower to read the incoming noun when the form of it (i.e., its phonological/orthographic properties) was atypical with respect to other words in the expected category.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. F. de Saussure Cours de Linguistique Generale (Paycot, Paris, 1916).
  2. C.-F. Hockett Sci. Am. 203 (3), 89–96 (1960).
  3. S. Pinker Words and Rules (Harper, New York, 1999).
  4. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 · DOI
  5. A. Goldberg Constructions at Work (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2006).
  6. L. Gleitman, E. Wanner Language Acquisition: The State of the Art, eds E. Wanner, L. Gleitman (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.), pp. 3–48 (1982).
  7. J.-L. Morgan, R. Shi, P. Allopenna Signal to Syntax, eds J.-L. Morgan, K. Demuth (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), pp. 263–283 (1996).
  8. L. Swanson, L. Leonard, J. Gandour J. Psycholinguist. Res. 35, 617–625 (1992).
  9. 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00047-5 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.349 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.001 · DOI
  12. G. Durieux, S. Gillis Approaches to Bootstrapping, eds J. Weissenborn, B. Höhle (Benjamins, Amsterdam), pp. 189–229 (2001). · DOI
  13. 10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.711 · DOI
  14. 10.3758/BF03196187 · DOI
  15. 10.1006/jmla.1993.1005 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90041-H · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90060-5 · DOI
  18. R. Baayen, R. Piepenbrock, L. Gulikers The CELEX Lexical Database (Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, 1995).
  19. 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.491 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00453.x · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9 · DOI
  22. M. Coltheart, E. Davelaar, J.-T. Jonasson, D. Bresner Attention and Performance, ed S. Dornic (Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ) Vol. VI, 535–555 (1977).
  23. 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90137-9 · DOI
  24. 10.1006/jmla.1993.1035 · DOI
  25. E.-B. Huey The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading (Macmillan, New York, 1908).
  26. 10.2307/1420279 · DOI · Paper page
  27. L. Onnis M.-H. Christiansen (Erlbaum Mahwah NJ) pp. 1678–1683 (2005).
  28. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.225 · DOI
  29. 10.1353/lan.2004.0056 · DOI
  30. M. Gasser (Erlbaum Mahwah NJ) pp. 434–439 (2004).
  31. 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.010 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/nn1504 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.05.006 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/5757 · DOI
  35. 10.1023/A:1010443001646 · DOI
  36. E. Bates, B. MacWhinney Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, ed B. MacWhinney (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 157–193 (1987).
  37. 10.1207/s15516709cog2304_8 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.03.001 · DOI
  39. M.-K. Tanenhaus, J.-C. Trueswell Speech, Language, and Communication, eds J.-L. Miller, P.-D. Eimas (Academic, San Diego), pp. 217–262 (1995). · DOI
  40. 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0 · DOI
  42. 10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.528 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00519-3 · DOI
  44. 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/BF01076840 · DOI
  46. 10.1162/089120103322711604 · DOI
  47. 10.1006/jmla.1999.2650 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00007-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-08-08
Volume
103
Issue
32
Pages
12203-12208
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2027682488
Cited by
219
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
lexical access, sound-meaning relationship, syntactic ambiguity, syntactic constraints, language development
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Language, Linguistics, Mental Processes, Psycholinguistics, Semantics, Speech, Verbal Behavior, Vocabulary, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review