The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension
Open accessAbstract
Since Saussure, the relationship between the sound and the meaning of words has been regarded as largely arbitrary. Here, however, we show that a probabilistic relationship exists between the sound of a word and its lexical category. Corpus analyses of nouns and verbs indicate that the phonological properties of the individual words in these two lexical categories form relatively separate and coherent clusters, with some nouns sounding more typical of the noun category than others and likewise for verbs. Additional analyses reveal that the phonological properties of nouns and verbs affect lexical access, and we also demonstrate the influence of such properties during the on-line processing of both simple unambiguous and syntactically ambiguous sentences. Thus, although the sound of a word may not provide cues to its specific meaning, phonological typicality, the degree to which the sound properties of an individual word are typical of other words in its lexical category, affects both word- and sentence-level language processing. The findings are consistent with a perspective on language comprehension in which sensitivity to multiple syntactic constraints in adulthood emerges as a product of language-development processes that are driven by the integration of multiple cues to linguistic structure, including phonological typicality.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When a sentential context conferred a strong expectation for a word of a given grammatical category, participants were slower to read the incoming noun when its form was atypical with respect to other words in the expected category.
“Farmer et al. (2006) demonstrated that when a sentential context conferred a strong expectation for a word of a given grammatical category (as in The child saved the … , where a noun is strongly expected), participants were slower to read the incoming noun when the form of it (i.e., its phonological/orthographic properties) was atypical with respect to other words in the expected category.”
From Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science (2013) · cites this paper as Farmer et al. 2006
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- F. de Saussure Cours de Linguistique Generale (Paycot, Paris, 1916).
- C.-F. Hockett Sci. Am. 203 (3), 89–96 (1960).
- S. Pinker Words and Rules (Harper, New York, 1999).
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 · DOI
- A. Goldberg Constructions at Work (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2006).
- L. Gleitman, E. Wanner Language Acquisition: The State of the Art, eds E. Wanner, L. Gleitman (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.), pp. 3–48 (1982).
- J.-L. Morgan, R. Shi, P. Allopenna Signal to Syntax, eds J.-L. Morgan, K. Demuth (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), pp. 263–283 (1996).
- L. Swanson, L. Leonard, J. Gandour J. Psycholinguist. Res. 35, 617–625 (1992).
- 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00047-5 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.349 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.001 · DOI
- G. Durieux, S. Gillis Approaches to Bootstrapping, eds J. Weissenborn, B. Höhle (Benjamins, Amsterdam), pp. 189–229 (2001). · DOI
- 10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.711 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03196187 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmla.1993.1005 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90041-H · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90060-5 · DOI
- R. Baayen, R. Piepenbrock, L. Gulikers The CELEX Lexical Database (Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, 1995).
- 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.491 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00453.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9 · DOI
- M. Coltheart, E. Davelaar, J.-T. Jonasson, D. Bresner Attention and Performance, ed S. Dornic (Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ) Vol. VI, 535–555 (1977).
- 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90137-9 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmla.1993.1035 · DOI
- E.-B. Huey The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading (Macmillan, New York, 1908).
- 10.2307/1420279 · DOI · Paper page
- L. Onnis M.-H. Christiansen (Erlbaum Mahwah NJ) pp. 1678–1683 (2005).
- 10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.225 · DOI
- 10.1353/lan.2004.0056 · DOI
- M. Gasser (Erlbaum Mahwah NJ) pp. 434–439 (2004).
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.010 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn1504 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.05.006 · DOI
- 10.1038/5757 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1010443001646 · DOI
- E. Bates, B. MacWhinney Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, ed B. MacWhinney (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 157–193 (1987).
- 10.1207/s15516709cog2304_8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.03.001 · DOI
- M.-K. Tanenhaus, J.-C. Trueswell Speech, Language, and Communication, eds J.-L. Miller, P.-D. Eimas (Academic, San Diego), pp. 217–262 (1995). · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.528 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00519-3 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01076840 · DOI
- 10.1162/089120103322711604 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmla.1999.2650 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00007-0 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Metadata
- Authors
- Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-08-08
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 12203-12208
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC1567719
- OpenAlex
- W2027682488
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- lexical access, sound-meaning relationship, syntactic ambiguity, syntactic constraints, language development
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Humans, Language, Linguistics, Mental Processes, Psycholinguistics, Semantics, Speech, Verbal Behavior, Vocabulary, Comprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review