Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lack of transmission of H5N1 avian–human reassortant influenza viruses in a ferret model

Open access
Maines, Taronna R., Chen, Li-Mei, Matsuoka, Yumiko, Chen, Hualan, Rowe, Thomas, Ortin, Juan, Falcón, Ana, Hien, Nguyen Tran, Mai, Le Quynh, Sedyaningsih, Endang R., Harun, Syahrial, Tumpey, Terrence M., Donis, Ruben O., Cox, Nancy J., Subbarao, Kanta, Katz, Jacqueline M.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Avian influenza A H5N1 viruses continue to spread globally among birds, resulting in occasional transmission of virus from infected poultry to humans. Probable human-to-human transmission has been documented rarely, but H5N1 viruses have not yet acquired the ability to transmit efficiently among humans, an essential property of a pandemic virus. The pandemics of 1957 and 1968 were caused by avian–human reassortant influenza viruses that had acquired human virus-like receptor binding properties. However, the relative contribution of human internal protein genes or other molecular changes to the efficient transmission of influenza viruses among humans remains poorly understood. Here, we report on a comparative ferret model that parallels the efficient transmission of H3N2 human viruses and the poor transmission of H5N1 avian viruses in humans. In this model, an H3N2 reassortant virus with avian virus internal protein genes exhibited efficient replication but inefficient transmission, whereas H5N1 reassortant viruses with four or six human virus internal protein genes exhibited reduced replication and no transmission. These findings indicate that the human virus H3N2 surface protein genes alone did not confer efficient transmissibility and that acquisition of human virus internal protein genes alone was insufficient for this 1997 H5N1 virus to develop pandemic capabilities, even after serial passages in a mammalian host. These results highlight the complexity of the genetic basis of influenza virus transmissibility and suggest that H5N1 viruses may require further adaptation to acquire this essential pandemic trait.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0605134103

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Maines, T. R., Chen, L.-M., Matsuoka, Y., Chen, H., Rowe, T., Ortin, J., Falcón, A., Hien, N. T., Mai, L. Q., Sedyaningsih, E. R., Harun, S., Tumpey, T. M., Donis, R. O., Cox, N. J., Subbarao, K., & Katz, J. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-08-08
Volume
103
Issue
32
Pages
12121-12126
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2095847051
Cited by
340
References
31
FWCI
19.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lack of transmission of H5N1 avian–human reassortant influenza viruses in a ferret model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0605134103
The paper
Maines, T. R., Chen, L.-M., Matsuoka, Y., Chen, H., Rowe, T., Ortin, J., Falcón, A., Hien, N. T., Mai, L. Q., Sedyaningsih, E. R., Harun, S., Tumpey, T. M., Donis, R. O., Cox, N. J., Subbarao, K., & Katz, J. M. (2006). Lack of transmission of H5N1 avian–human reassortant influenza viruses in a ferret model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605134103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.