Cited by 2,112Polymer Surface Interaction StudiesMarine Biology and Environmental ChemistryAdhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

Single-molecule mechanics of mussel adhesion

Open access
Lee, Haeshin, Scherer, Norbert F., Messersmith, Phillip B.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The glue proteins secreted by marine mussels bind strongly to virtually all inorganic and organic surfaces in aqueous environments in which most adhesives function poorly. Studies of these functionally unique proteins have revealed the presence of the unusual amino acid 3,4-dihydroxy- l -phenylalanine (dopa), which is formed by posttranslational modification of tyrosine. However, the detailed binding mechanisms of dopa remain unknown, and the chemical basis for mussels’ ability to adhere to both inorganic and organic surfaces has never been fully explained. Herein, we report a single-molecule study of the substrate and oxidation-dependent adhesive properties of dopa. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements of a single dopa residue contacting a wet metal oxide surface reveal a surprisingly high strength yet fully reversible, noncovalent interaction. The magnitude of the bond dissociation energy as well as the inability to observe this interaction with tyrosine suggests that dopa is critical to adhesion and that the binding mechanism is not hydrogen bond formation. Oxidation of dopa, as occurs during curing of the secreted mussel glue, dramatically reduces the strength of the interaction to metal oxide but results in high strength irreversible covalent bond formation to an organic surface. A new picture of the interfacial adhesive role of dopa emerges from these studies, in which dopa exploits a remarkable combination of high strength and chemical multifunctionality to accomplish adhesion to substrates of widely varying composition from organic to metallic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0605552103

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coordination bonding and strong chelating bonding with transition metal compounds occur between catechol or diketone groups on the polydopamine coating layer and the interface of inorganic biosubstitutes, along with protein cross-linking.

    “Such coordination bonding and strong chelating bonding with transition metal compound occur between catechol or diketone groups on the PDA coating layer and the interface of inorganic biosubstitutes along with the protein cross-linking [61–66].”

    From Polydopamine-Assisted Surface Modification for Bone Biosubstitutes (2016) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Results and Discussion (page not provided) report strong, reversible coordination bonds between unoxidized dopa and inorganic oxide surfaces, and describe oxidized dopa as participating in protein cross-linking. The paper studies individual dopa residues, not a polydopamine coating on inorganic biosubstitutes; it does not establish the claimed diketone-mediated chelation at that interface. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [1]Autumn K., Liang Y. A., Hsieh S. T., Zesch W., Chan W. P., Kenny T. W., Fearing R., Full R. J. Nature. 2000;405:681–685. doi: 10.1038/35015073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. [2]Chisholm J. R. M., Kelley R. Nature. 2001;409:152. doi: 10.1038/35051660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. [3]Waite J. H. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2002;42:1172–1180. doi: 10.1093/icb/42.6.1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [4]Waite J. H., Tanzer M. L. Science. 1981;212:1038–1040. doi: 10.1126/science.212.4498.1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. [5]Crisp D. J., Walker G., Young G. A., Yule A. B. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1985;104:40–50. [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Waite J. H. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1999;875:301–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08513.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [7]Papov V. V., Diamond T. V., Biemann K., Waite J. H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:20183–20192. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.34.20183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  8. [8]Waite J. H., Qin X. Biochemistry. 2001;40:2887–2893. doi: 10.1021/bi002718x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  9. [9]Yu M., Hwang J., Deming T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:5825–5826. [Google Scholar]
  10. [11]Haemers S., Koper G. J. M., Frens G. Biomacromolecules. 2003;4:632–640. doi: 10.1021/bm025707n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [12]Monahan J., Wilker J. J. Langmuir. 2004;20:3724–3729. doi: 10.1021/la0362728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [13]Young G. A., Crisp D. J. In: Adhesion. Allen K. W., editor. London: Applied Science; 1982. pp. 19–39. [Google Scholar]
  13. [14]Yu M., Deming T. J. Macromolecules. 1998;31:4739–4745. doi: 10.1021/ma980268z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [15]Frank B. P., Belfort G. Biotech. Prog. 2002;18:580–586. doi: 10.1021/bp010140s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. [16]Hwang D. S., Yoo H. J., Jun J. H., Moon W. K., Cha H. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004;70:3352–3359. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.6.3352-3359.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [17]Hinterdorfer P., Baumgartner W., Gruber H. J., Schilcher K., Schindler H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:3477–3481. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [18]Oesterhelt F., Rief M., Gaub H. E. N. J. Phys. 1999;1:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  18. [19]Grandbois M., Beyer M., Rief M., Clausen-Schaumann H., Gaub H. E. Science. 1999;283:1727–1730. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5408.1727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. [20]Liphardt J., Onoa B., Smith S. B., Tinacio J. I., Bustamante C. Science. 2001;292:733–737. doi: 10.1126/science.1058498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. [21]Merkel R., Nassoy P., Leung A., Ritchie K., Evans E. Nature. 1999;397:50–53. doi: 10.1038/16219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. [22]Vega-Arroyo M., LeBreton P. R., Rajh T., Zapol P., Curtiss L. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005;406:306–311. [Google Scholar]
  22. [23]Zhao H., Robertson N. B., Jewhurst S. A., Waite J. H. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:11090–11096. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510792200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. [24]Rodriguez R., Blesa M. A., Regazzoni A. E. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996;177:122–131. doi: 10.1006/jcis.1996.0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [25]Zhao H., Sun C., Stewart R. J., Waite J. H. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:42938–42944. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508457200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  25. [26]Fadeev A. Y., McCarthy T. J. Langmuir. 2000;16:7268–7274. [Google Scholar]
  26. [27]Paunesku T., Rajh T., Wiederrecht G., Maser J., Vogt S., Stojicevic M., Protic M., Lai B., Oryhon J., Thurnauer M., Woloschak G. Nat. Mat. 2003;2:343–346. doi: 10.1038/nmat875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [28]Statz A. R., Meagher R. J., Barron A. E., Messersmith P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:7972–7973. doi: 10.1021/ja0522534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. [29]Dalsin D. L., Hu B.-H., Lee B. P., Messersmith P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:4253–4258. doi: 10.1021/ja0284963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  29. [30]Pierson H. O. Handbook of Chemical Vapor Deposition. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  30. [31]Hutter J. L., Bechhoefer J. Rev. Sci. Instr. 1993;64:1868–1873. [Google Scholar]
  31. [32]Leckband D., Israelachvili J. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2001;2:105–267. doi: 10.1017/s0033583501003687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  32. [33]Waite J. H. Chem. Ind. (London) 1991;17:607. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, H., Scherer, N. F., & Messersmith, P. B.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-08-29
Volume
103
Issue
35
Pages
12999-13003
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2154577831
Cited by
2,112
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 164 · 2019: 150 · 2018: 149 · 2017: 138 · 2016: 150 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 137 · 2013: 112 · 2012: 108
FWCI
19.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE014193, DE14193, R37DE014193)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Keywords
mussel adhesive proteins, DOPA, single-molecule mechanics, non-covalent binding, bond dissociation energy, metal oxide surfaces, organic surfaces, covalent bonding, post-translational modification, hydrogen bonding, wet adhesion
MeSH terms
Adhesiveness, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Dihydroxyphenylalanine, Molecular Sequence Data, Oxidation-Reduction, Proteins, Titanium, Microscopy, Atomic Force, Bivalvia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review