Cited by 163Redox biology and oxidative stressT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects

Importance of culturing primary lymphocytes at physiological oxygen levels

Open access
Atkuri, Kondala R., Herzenberg, Leonard A., Niemi, Anna-Kaisa, Cowan, Tina, Herzenberg, Leonore A.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Although studies with primary lymphocytes are almost always conducted in CO 2 incubators maintained at atmospheric oxygen levels (atmosO 2 ; 20%), the physiological oxygen levels (physO 2 ; 5%) that cells encounter in vivo are 2–4 times lower. We show here that culturing primary T cells at atmosO 2 significantly alters the intracellular redox state (decreases intracellular glutathione, increases oxidized intracellular glutathione), whereas culturing at physO 2 maintains the intracellular redox environment (intracellular glutathione/oxidized intracellular glutathione) close to its in vivo status. Furthermore, we show that CD3/CD28-induced T cell proliferation (based on proliferation index and cell yield) is higher at atmosO 2 than at physO 2 . This apparently paradoxical finding, we suggest, may be explained by two additional findings with CD3/CD28-stimulated T cells: ( i ) the intracellular NO (iNO) levels are higher at physO 2 than at atmosO 2 ; and ( ii ) the peak expression of CD69 is significantly delayed and more sustained at physO 2 that at atmosO 2 . Because high levels of intracellular NO and sustained CD69 tend to down-regulate T cell responses in vivo , the lower proliferative T cell responses at physO 2 likely reflect the in vitro operation of the natural in vivo regulatory mechanisms. Thus, we suggest caution in culturing primary lymphocytes at atmosO 2 because the requisite adaptation to nonphysiological oxygen levels may seriously skew T cell responses, particularly after several days in culture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0611732104

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • T cells activated at physiologic O2 tension (2-5% O2) have reduced proliferation and expansion following TCR stimulation.

    “when T cells are activated in conditions of physiologic oxygen tension (2–5 % O2, ~2–5 kPa, or ~15–38 mm Hg), there are a number of changes in T cell dynamics. First, T cells activated at physiologic O2 tension have reduced proliferation and expansion following TCR stimulation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]Nishikawa M, Sato EF, Utsumi K, Inoue M. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4535–4540. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [31]Reuveny S, Velez D, Riske F, MacMillan JD, Miller L. Dev Biol Stand. 1985;60:185–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atkuri, K. R., Herzenberg, L. A., Niemi, A.-K., Cowan, T., & Herzenberg, L. A.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-03-13
Volume
104
Issue
11
Pages
4547-4552
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1973393458
Cited by
163
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • School of Medicine, Stanford University
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI566223)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Keywords
primary T cells, cellular redox state, glutathione, T cell proliferation, nitric oxide, CD69, anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation, T cell regulation
MeSH terms
CD69 Antigens, Antigens, Differentiation, T-Lymphocyte, Carbon Dioxide, Cell Differentiation, Cell Survival, Humans, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Lymphocytes, Oxidation-Reduction, Oxygen, T-Lymphocytes, Antigens, CD, CD3 Complex, CD28 Antigens, Cell Culture Techniques, Lectins, C-Type, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review