Cited by 290DNA Repair MechanismsFungal and yeast genetics researchCancer-related Molecular Pathways

The Dun1 checkpoint kinase phosphorylates and regulates the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1

Open access
Zhao, Xiaolan, Rothstein, Rodney·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Cell cycle checkpoints are evolutionarily conserved surveillance systems that protect genomic stability and prevent oncogenesis in mammals. One important target of checkpoint control is ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), which catalyzes the rate-limiting step in dNTP and DNA synthesis. In both yeast and humans, RNR is transcriptionally induced after DNA damage via Mec1/Rad53 (yeast) and ATM/CHK2 (human) checkpoint pathways. In addition, yeast checkpoint proteins Mec1 and Rad53 also regulate the RNR inhibitor Sml1. After DNA damage or at S phase, Mec1 and Rad53 control the phosphorylation and concomitant degradation of Sml1 protein. This new layer of control contributes to the increased dNTP production likely necessary for DNA repair and replication; however, the molecular mechanism is unclear. Here we show that Dun1, a downstream kinase of Mec1/Rad53, genetically and physically interacts with Sml1 in vivo . The absence of Dun1 activity leads to the accumulation of Sml1 protein at S phase and after DNA damage. As a result, dun1 Δ strains need more time to finish DNA replication, are defective in mitochondrial DNA propagation, and are sensitive to DNA-damaging agents. Moreover, phospho-Sml1 is absent or dramatically reduced in dun1 Δ cells. Finally, Dun1 can phosphorylate Sml1 in vitro . These results suggest that Dun1 kinase function is the last step required in the Mec1/Rad53 cascade to remove Sml1 during S phase and after DNA damage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.062502299

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Checkpoints actively stimulate repair processes and, in higher eukaryotes, trigger apoptosis when damage cannot be successfully dealt with.

    “The checkpoints also actively stimulate the repair processes [1–9] and, in higher eukaryotes, trigger the apoptotic response, if damage cannot be dealt with successfully [10–12].”

    From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [1]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, X., & Rothstein, R.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Rothstein, Rodney
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-03-19
Volume
99
Issue
6
Pages
3746-3751
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2078957361
Cited by
290
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Baylor University
  • Frances McClelland Institute for Children, Youth, and Families
  • National Institutes of Health (GM50237)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM050237, GM 50237, R37GM050237)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
ribonucleotide reductase, cell cycle checkpoints, DNA damage response, protein phosphorylation, protein degradation, S phase, DNA replication, DNA-damaging agents, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
Trefoil Factor-2, Alleles, Cell Division, DNA Damage, Enzyme Inhibitors, Fungal Proteins, Genes, Lethal, Models, Biological, Phenotype, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Protein Kinases, Ribonucleotide Reductases, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S Phase, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Gene Deletion, Cell Cycle Proteins, Two-Hybrid System Techniques, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Checkpoint Kinase 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review