The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces
Open accessAbstract
Infant monkeys were reared with no exposure to any faces for 6–24 months. Before being allowed to see a face, the monkeys showed a preference for human and monkey faces in photographs, and they discriminated human faces as well as monkey faces. After the deprivation period, the monkeys were exposed first to either human or monkey faces for a month. Soon after, the monkeys selectively discriminated the exposed species of face and showed a marked difficulty in regaining the ability to discriminate the other nonexposed species of face. These results indicate the existence of an experience-independent ability for face processing as well as an apparent sensitive period during which a broad but flexible face prototype develops into a concrete one for efficient processing of familiar faces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Visual Following and Pattern Discrimination of Face-like Stimuli by Newborn Infants
Goren, C. C., Sarty, M., & Wu, P. Y. K. (1975) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.56.4.544 · Cited by 1,158
Domain specificity in face perception
Kanwisher, N. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/77664 · Cited by 968
“Newborns' Preference for Face-Relevant Stimuli: Effects of Contrast Polarity”
Farroni, T., Johnson, M. H., Menon, E., Zulian, L., Faraguna, D., & Csibra, G. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0502205102 · Cited by 467
The effect of dark rearing on the time course of the critical period in cat visual cortex
Mower, G. D. (1991) · Developmental Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0165-3806(91)90001-y · Cited by 220
Cited by
Adolescence as a sensitive period of brain development
Fuhrmann, D., Knoll, L. J., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.008 · Cited by 1,158
How the Timing and Quality of Early Experiences Influence the Development of Brain Architecture
Fox, S. E., Levitt, P., & Nelson, C. A. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01380.x · Cited by 1,088
Functional specificity in the human brain: a window into the functional architecture of the mind
Kanwisher, N. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1005062107 · Cited by 929
Balas, B. J., Nelson, C. A., Westerlund, A., Vogel-Farley, V., Riggins, T., & Kuefner, D. (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.001.2010 · Cited by 542
Social re-orientation and brain development: An expanded and updated view
Nelson, E. E., Jarcho, J. M., & Guyer, A. E. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.008 · Cited by 447
“…prolongs the closing of the window for organization of the visual cortex (Johnson, 2005), while restricted physical exposure to conspecifics can delay the closing of sexual imprinting (Bischof et al., 2002; Bischof, 2007) and delay the narrowing of face perception capabilities (Sugita, 2008).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Sugita, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-01-08
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 394-398
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2039179390
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0706079105
- The paper
- Sugita, Y. (2008). Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706079105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
