The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
XML extraction Test-DEC09-2
Open accessAbstract
Infant face processing becomes more selective during the first year of life as a function of varying experience with distinct face categories defined by species, race, and age. Given that any individual face belongs to many such categories (e.g. A young Caucasian man's face) we asked how the neural selectivity for one aspect of facial appearance was affected by category membership along another dimension of variability. 6-month-old infants were shown upright and inverted pictures of either their own mother or a stranger while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. We found that the amplitude of the P400 (a face-sensitive ERP component) was only sensitive to the orientation of the mother's face, suggesting that "tuning" of the neural response to faces is realized jointly across multiple dimensions of face appearance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yin, R. K. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027474 · Cited by 2,624
Specialization of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Face Recognition in Human Infants
Haan, M. D., Pascalis, O., & Johnson, M. H. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892902317236849 · Cited by 553
“Newborns' Preference for Face-Relevant Stimuli: Effects of Contrast Polarity”
Farroni, T., Johnson, M. H., Menon, E., Zulian, L., Faraguna, D., & Csibra, G. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0502205102 · Cited by 467
Brain activity differentiates face and object processing in 6-month-old infants.
de Haan, M., & Nelson, C. A. (1999) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.1113 · Cited by 370
Self-citation
Cited by
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Emotion regulation: current status and future prospects
Gross, J. J. (2015) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2014.940781 · Cited by 5,229
Discovering Event Structure in Continuous Narrative Perception and Memory
Baldassano, C., Chen, J., Zadbood, A., Pillow, J. W., Hasson, U., & Norman, K. A. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.041 · Cited by 952
Lee, S. S., Humphreys, K. L., Flory, K., Liu, R., & Glass, K. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.01.006 · Cited by 875
The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation
Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., Icenogle, G., Duell, N., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010 · Cited by 867
Metadata
- Authors
- Balas, B. J., Nelson, C. A., Westerlund, A., Vogel-Farley, V., Riggins, T., & Kuefner, D.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154697997
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 28.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: XML extraction Test-DEC09-2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/neuro.09.001.2010
- The paper
- Balas, B. J., Nelson, C. A., Westerlund, A., Vogel-Farley, V., Riggins, T., & Kuefner, D. (2010). XML extraction Test-DEC09-2. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.001.2010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
