The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Targeted gene knockout in mammalian cells by using engineered zinc-finger nucleases
Open accessAbstract
Gene knockout is the most powerful tool for determining gene function or permanently modifying the phenotypic characteristics of a cell. Existing methods for gene disruption are limited by their efficiency, time to completion, and/or the potential for confounding off-target effects. Here, we demonstrate a rapid single-step approach to targeted gene knockout in mammalian cells, using engineered zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs). ZFNs can be designed to target a chosen locus with high specificity. Upon transient expression of these nucleases the target gene is first cleaved by the ZFNs and then repaired by a natural—but imperfect—DNA repair process, nonhomologous end joining. This often results in the generation of mutant (null) alleles. As proof of concept for this approach we designed ZFNs to target the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene in a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line. We observed biallelic gene disruption at frequencies >1%, thus obviating the need for selection markers. Three new genetically distinct DHFR −/− cell lines were generated. Each new line exhibited growth and functional properties consistent with the specific knockout of the DHFR gene. Importantly, target gene disruption is complete within 2–3 days of transient ZFN delivery, thus enabling the isolation of the resultant DHFR −/− cell lines within 1 month. These data demonstrate further the utility of ZFNs for rapid mammalian cell line engineering and establish a new method for gene knockout with application to reverse genetics, functional genomics, drug discovery, and therapeutic recombinant protein production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Production of recombinant protein therapeutics in cultivated mammalian cells
Wurm, F. M. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1026 · Cited by 2,032
An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing
Miller, J. C., Holmes, M. C., Wang, J., Guschin, D. Y., Lee, Y.-L., Rupniewski, I., Beausejour, C. M., Waite, A. J., Wang, N. S., Kim, K. A., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1319 · Cited by 1,051
Self-citationTargeted Chromosomal Cleavage and Mutagenesis in Drosophila Using Zinc-Finger Nucleases
Bibikova, M., Golic, M., Golic, K. G., & Carroll, D. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/161.3.1169 · Cited by 860
Homology-directed repair is a major double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells
Liang, F., Han, M., Romanienko, P. J., & Jasin, M. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.9.5172 · Cited by 649
Gene targeting using zinc finger nucleases
Porteus, M. H., & Carroll, D. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1125 · Cited by 641
Protein Folding in the Endoplasmic Reticulum and the Unfolded Protein Response
Zhang, K., & Kaufman, R. J. (2005) · Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/3-540-29717-0_3 · Cited by 152
Cited by
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering
Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A., & Barbas, C. F. (2013) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 · Cited by 3,820
Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases
Urnov, F. D., Rebar, E. J., Holmes, M. C., Zhang, H. S., & Gregory, P. D. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2842 · Cited by 2,285
Self-citationTALENs: A widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing
Joung, J. K., & Sander, J. D. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3486 · Cited by 1,650
“…38 , catfish 39 , sea urchin 40 , frog 41 , pig 42 , cattle 43 , cricket 8 , rabbit 44 , silkworm 45 , butterfly 46 , mouse 47, 48 , rat 49, 50 , soybean 51, 52 , thale cress 53, 54 , corn 55 , tobacco 56 , petunia 57 , hamster cells 58 , and human somatic 59, 60 and pluripotent stem cells 61–63 .”
Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases
Cho, S. W., Kim, S., Kim, Y., Kweon, J., Kim, H. S., Bae, S., & Kim, J.-S. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.162339.113 · Cited by 1,356
A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases
Kim, H., & Kim, J.-S. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3686 · Cited by 1,163
Metadata
- Authors
- Santiago, Y., Chan, E., Liu, P.-Q., Orlando, S., Zhang, L., Urnov, F. D., Holmes, M. C., Guschin, D., Waite, A., Miller, J. C., Rebar, E. J., Gregory, P. D., Klug, A., & Collingwood, T. N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-04-15
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5809-5814
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2133385816
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 14.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted gene knockout in mammalian cells by using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0800940105
- The paper
- Santiago, Y., Chan, E., Liu, P.-Q., Orlando, S., Zhang, L., Urnov, F. D., Holmes, M. C., Guschin, D., Waite, A., Miller, J. C., Rebar, E. J., Gregory, P. D., Klug, A., & Collingwood, T. N. (2008). Targeted gene knockout in mammalian cells by using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800940105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.