The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DEET repels ORNery mosquitoes
Open accessAbstract
DEET ([N-N]-diethyl-m-toluamide) is widely used around the world as a repellent for mosquitoes and other biting insects. It was originally identified by a structure–activity study using synthetic compounds (1). Recently, a number of new compounds with similar activity [e.g., picaridine (2)] have been identified, but DEET remains the gold standard. Despite a tremendous number of studies (3), however, a plausible and evidence-based mechanism for DEET's action has remained elusive. In a recent study, Ditzen et al. (4) wrote, “Here we show that DEET blocks electrophysiological responses to olfactory sensory neurons to attractive odors in Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster” (Fig. 1A). However, in this issue of PNAS, Syed and Leal (5) present a new mechanism that demonstrates that mosquitoes detect DEET by means of olfaction and that this is the direct cause of their avoidance behavior (Fig. 1B).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are several electrophysiological and behavioural assays with correspondingly robust analyses currently being used in vector biology research that could be incorporated into such schemes once adopted by WHOPES and the wider scientific community.
“The promising news is that there are several electrophysiological and behavioural assays with correspondingly robust analyses currently being used in vector biology research that could be incorporated into such schemes once adopted by WHOPES and the wider scientific community [16,36-42].”
From Spatial repellents: from discovery and development to evidence-based validation (2012) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cites
Mosquitoes smell and avoid the insect repellent DEET
Syed, Z., & Leal, W. S. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805312105 · Cited by 334
Logan, J. G., Birkett, M. A., Clark, S. J., Powers, S., Seal, N. J., Wadhams, L. J., Mordue (Luntz), A. J., & Pickett, J. A. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-008-9436-0 · Cited by 239
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1021/jo01369a003 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199612)48:4<359::AID-PS490>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- , eds M Debboun, SP Frances, D Strickman (CRC, Boca Raton, FL Insect Repellents: Principles, Methods, and Uses, 2007).
- 10.1126/science.1153121 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1015205716921 · DOI
- 10.1139/f05-231 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spatial repellents: from discovery and development to evidence-based validation
Achee, N. L., Bangs, M. J., Farlow, R., Killeen, G. F., Lindsay, S., Logan, J. G., Moore, S. J., Rowland, M., Sweeney, K., Torr, S. J., et al. (2012) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-164 · Cited by 303
“The promising news is that there are several electrophysiological and behavioural assays with correspondingly robust analyses currently being used in vector biology research that could be incorporated into such schemes once adopted by WHOPES and the wider scientific community [16,36-42].”
BackgroundSelf-citationStanczyk, N. M., Brookfield, J. F. Y., Ignell, R., Logan, J. G., & Field, L. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1001313107 · Cited by 138
Self-citationDambolena, J. S., Zunino, M. P., Herrera, J. M., Pizzolitto, R. P., Areco, V. A., & Zygadlo, J. A. (2016) · Psyche: A Journal of Entomology · doi:10.1155/2016/4595823 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Pickett, J. A., Birkett, M. A., & Logan, J. G.
- Affiliations
- Rothamsted Research (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-09-09
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 13195-13196
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2533167
- OpenAlex
- W2022788566
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/C/00004190, BBS/E/C/00004189)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Keywords
- DEET, mosquito repellents, mosquito behavior, repellent efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DEET, Humans, Culicidae, Smell, Olfactory Receptor Neurons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review