Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative evaluation of the antitumor activity of antiangiogenic proteins delivered by gene transfer

Open access
Kuo, Calvin J., Farnebo, Filip, Yu, Evan Y., Christofferson, Rolf, Swearingen, Rebecca A., Carter, Robert, von Recum, Horst A., Yuan, Jenny, Kamihara, Junne, Flynn, Evelyn, D'Amato, Robert, Folkman, Judah, Mulligan, Richard C.·2001·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Although the systemic administration of a number of different gene products has been shown to result in the inhibition of angiogenesis and tumor growth in different animal tumor models, the relative potency of those gene products has not been studied rigorously. To address this issue, recombinant adenoviruses encoding angiostatin, endostatin, and the ligand-binding ectodomains of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors Flk1, Flt1, and neuropilin were generated and used to systemically deliver the different gene products in several different preexisting murine tumor models. Single i.v. injections of viruses encoding soluble forms of Flk1 or Flt1 resulted in ≈80% inhibition of preexisting tumor growth in murine models involving both murine (Lewis lung carcinoma, T241 fibrosarcoma) and human (BxPC3 pancreatic carcinoma) tumors. In contrast, adenoviruses encoding angiostatin, endostatin, or neuropilin were significantly less effective. A strong correlation was observed between the effects of the different viruses on tumor growth and the activity of the viruses in the inhibition of corneal micropocket angiogenesis. These data underscore the need for comparative analyses of different therapeutic approaches that target tumor angiogenesis and provide a rationale for the selection of specific antiangiogenic gene products as lead candidates for use in gene therapy approaches aimed at the treatment of malignant and ocular disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.081615298

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Kuo, C. J., Farnebo, F., Yu, E. Y., Christofferson, R., Swearingen, R. A., Carter, R., von Recum, H. A., Yuan, J., Kamihara, J., Flynn, E., D'Amato, R., Folkman, J., & Mulligan, R. C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2001-03-27
Volume
98
Issue
8
Pages
4605-4610
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2105669313
Cited by
271
References
4
FWCI
10.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative evaluation of the antitumor activity of antiangiogenic proteins delivered by gene transfer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.081615298
The paper
Kuo, C. J., Farnebo, F., Yu, E. Y., Christofferson, R., Swearingen, R. A., Carter, R., von Recum, H. A., Yuan, J., Kamihara, J., Flynn, E., D'Amato, R., Folkman, J., & Mulligan, R. C. (2001). Comparative evaluation of the antitumor activity of antiangiogenic proteins delivered by gene transfer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.081615298

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.