The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA methylation is widespread and associated with differential gene expression in castes of the honeybee, Apis mellifera
Open accessAbstract
The recent, unexpected discovery of a functional DNA methylation system in the genome of the social bee Apis mellifera underscores the potential importance of DNA methylation in invertebrates. The extent of genomic DNA methylation and its role in A. mellifera remain unknown, however. Here we show that genes in A. mellifera can be divided into 2 distinct classes, one with low-CpG dinucleotide content and the other with high-CpG dinucleotide content. This dichotomy is explained by the gradual depletion of CpG dinucleotides, a well-known consequence of DNA methylation. The loss of CpG dinucleotides associated with DNA methylation also may explain the unusual mutational patterns seen in A. mellifera that lead to AT-rich regions of the genome. A detailed investigation of this dichotomy implicates DNA methylation in A. mellifera development. High-CpG genes, which are predicted to be hypomethylated in germlines, are enriched with functions associated with developmental processes, whereas low-CpG genes, predicted to be hypermethylated in germlines, are enriched with functions associated with basic biological processes. Furthermore, genes more highly expressed in one caste than another are overrepresented among high-CpG genes. Our results highlight the potential significance of epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, in developmental processes in social insects. In particular, the pervasiveness of DNA methylation in the genome of A. mellifera provides fertile ground for future studies of phenotypic plasticity and genomic imprinting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery
Dennis, G., Sherman, B. T., Hosack, D. A., Yang, J., Gao, W., Lane, H. C., & Lempicki, R. A. (2003) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-p3 · Cited by 9,327
DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory
Bird, A. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.947102 · Cited by 7,124
DNA methylation landscapes: Provocative insights from epigenomics
Suzuki, M. M., & Bird, A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2341 · Cited by 3,039
Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells
Meissner, A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Gu, H., Wernig, M., Hanna, J., Sivachenko, A., Zhang, X., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Jaffe, D. B., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07107 · Cited by 2,536
Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators.
Klose, R. J., & Bird, A. P. (2006) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2005.12.008 · Cited by 2,501
Cited by
The Honey Bee Epigenomes: Differential Methylation of Brain DNA in Queens and Workers
Lyko, F., Foret, S., Kucharski, R., Wolf, S., Falckenhayn, C., & Maleszka, R. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000506 · Cited by 727
Developmental origins of metabolic disease: Life course and intergenerational perspectives
Godfrey, K. M., Gluckman, P. D., & Hanson, M. A. (2010) · Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.tem.2009.12.008 · Cited by 485
Genomic signatures of evolutionary transitions from solitary to group living
Kapheim, K. M., Pan, H., Li, C., Salzberg, S. L., Puiu, D., Magoc, T., Robertson, H. M., Hudson, M. E., Venkat, A., Fischman, B. J., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4788 · Cited by 409
Self-citationDNA methylation in social insects: how epigenetics can control behavior and longevity
Yan, H., Bonasio, R., Simola, D. F., Liebig, J., Berger, S. L., & Reinberg, D. (2015) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020803 · Cited by 183
Chango, A., & Pogribny, I. (2015) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu7042748 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Elango, N., Hunt, B. G., Goodisman, M. A. D., & Yi, S. V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-07-07
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 11206-11211
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2055742349
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA methylation is widespread and associated with differential gene expression in castes of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0900301106
- The paper
- Elango, N., Hunt, B. G., Goodisman, M. A. D., & Yi, S. V. (2009). DNA methylation is widespread and associated with differential gene expression in castes of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900301106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.