Cited by 404

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Paradoxical glomerular filtration of carbon nanotubes

Ruggiero, Alessandro, Villa, Carlos H., Bander, Evan, Rey, Diego A., Bergkvist, Magnus, Batt, Carl A., Manova-Todorova, Katia, Deen, William M., Scheinberg, David A., McDevitt, Michael R.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The molecular weight cutoff for glomerular filtration is thought to be 30–50 kDa. Here we report rapid and efficient filtration of molecules 10–20 times that mass and a model for the mechanism of this filtration. We conducted multimodal imaging studies in mice to investigate renal clearance of a single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) construct covalently appended with ligands allowing simultaneous dynamic positron emission tomography, near-infrared fluorescence imaging, and microscopy. These SWCNTs have a length distribution ranging from 100 to 500 nm. The average length was determined to be 200–300 nm, which would yield a functionalized construct with a molecular weight of ∼350–500 kDa. The construct was rapidly ( t 1/2 ∼ 6 min) renally cleared intact by glomerular filtration, with partial tubular reabsorption and transient translocation into the proximal tubular cell nuclei. Directional absorption was confirmed in vitro using polarized renal cells. Active secretion via transporters was not involved. Mathematical modeling of the rotational diffusivity showed the tendency of flow to orient SWCNTs of this size to allow clearance via the glomerular pores. Surprisingly, these results raise questions about the rules for renal filtration, given that these large molecules (with aspect ratios ranging from 100:1 to 500:1) were cleared similarly to small molecules. SWCNTs and other novel nanomaterials are being actively investigated for potential biomedical applications, and these observations—that high aspect ratio as well as large molecular size have an impact on glomerular filtration—will allow the design of novel nanoscale-based therapeutics with unusual pharmacologic characteristics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0913667107

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1038/nnano.2009.241 · DOI
  2. 10.1039/b209843a · DOI
  3. 10.1021/cr050569o · DOI
  4. 10.1039/b518111a · DOI
  5. 10.1166/jnn.2004.146 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.0509009103 · DOI
  7. 10.2967/jnumed.106.039131 · DOI
  8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000907 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/nl801878d · DOI
  10. 10.1002/adma.200702334 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/smll.200800323 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.2217/17435889.3.2.149 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.0707654105 · DOI
  14. D Birkett, Clearance of drugs by the kidneys. Aust Prescriber 15, 16–19 (1992).
  15. 10.1007/s12274-009-9009-8 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/sj.ki.5002317 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s00259-007-0519-x · DOI
  18. 10.1074/jbc.M109959200 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0377-0257(02)00171-4 · DOI
  20. 10.1063/1.1730994 · DOI
  21. 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.281.4.F579 · DOI
  22. WM Deen, CR Bridges, BM Brenner, BD Myers, Heteroporous model of glomerular size selectivity: Application to normal and nephrotic humans. Am J Physiol 249, F374–F389 (1985).
  23. 10.1152/physrev.00055.2006 · DOI
  24. 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.281.1.F103 · DOI
  25. 10.1046/j.1365-201X.1998.0316f.x · DOI
  26. 10.1021/ar900035f · DOI
  27. 10.1021/ja043061w · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.0609265103 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/nnano.2008.68 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.08.011 · DOI
  31. 10.1021/nl061160x · DOI
  32. 10.1038/nbt0708-774 · DOI
  33. 10.1021/nn800461u · DOI
  34. K Milton Scattering of Light and Other Electromagnetic Radiation (Academic Press, New York, 1997).
  35. 10.1021/mp800078a · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 404

Metadata

Authors
Ruggiero, A., Villa, C. H., Bander, E., Rey, D. A., Bergkvist, M., Batt, C. A., Manova-Todorova, K., Deen, W. M., Scheinberg, D. A., & McDevitt, M. R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-06-21
Volume
107
Issue
27
Pages
12369-12374
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
404
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paradoxical glomerular filtration of carbon nanotubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0913667107
The paper
Ruggiero, A., Villa, C. H., Bander, E., Rey, D. A., Bergkvist, M., Batt, C. A., Manova-Todorova, K., Deen, W. M., Scheinberg, D. A., & McDevitt, M. R. (2010). Paradoxical glomerular filtration of carbon nanotubes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913667107