The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Paradoxical glomerular filtration of carbon nanotubes
Abstract
The molecular weight cutoff for glomerular filtration is thought to be 30–50 kDa. Here we report rapid and efficient filtration of molecules 10–20 times that mass and a model for the mechanism of this filtration. We conducted multimodal imaging studies in mice to investigate renal clearance of a single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) construct covalently appended with ligands allowing simultaneous dynamic positron emission tomography, near-infrared fluorescence imaging, and microscopy. These SWCNTs have a length distribution ranging from 100 to 500 nm. The average length was determined to be 200–300 nm, which would yield a functionalized construct with a molecular weight of ∼350–500 kDa. The construct was rapidly ( t 1/2 ∼ 6 min) renally cleared intact by glomerular filtration, with partial tubular reabsorption and transient translocation into the proximal tubular cell nuclei. Directional absorption was confirmed in vitro using polarized renal cells. Active secretion via transporters was not involved. Mathematical modeling of the rotational diffusivity showed the tendency of flow to orient SWCNTs of this size to allow clearance via the glomerular pores. Surprisingly, these results raise questions about the rules for renal filtration, given that these large molecules (with aspect ratios ranging from 100:1 to 500:1) were cleared similarly to small molecules. SWCNTs and other novel nanomaterials are being actively investigated for potential biomedical applications, and these observations—that high aspect ratio as well as large molecular size have an impact on glomerular filtration—will allow the design of novel nanoscale-based therapeutics with unusual pharmacologic characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Surprisingly, large nanofiber-like materials, such as individualized carbon nanotubes with diameters and lengths of up to 20 – 30 nm and 500 – 2000 nm, respectively, easily cross through the renal filtration barrier when aligned in the right orientation, and are cleared with similar efficiency as small molecules [41, 42].”
From Particle toxicology and health - where are we? (2019) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Longmire, M., Choyke, P. L., & Kobayashi, H. (2008) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/17435889.3.5.703 · Cited by 2,149
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1038/nnano.2009.241 · DOI
- 10.1039/b209843a · DOI
- 10.1021/cr050569o · DOI
- 10.1039/b518111a · DOI
- 10.1166/jnn.2004.146 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0509009103 · DOI
- 10.2967/jnumed.106.039131 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0000907 · DOI
- 10.1021/nl801878d · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.200702334 · DOI
- 10.1002/smll.200800323 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2217/17435889.3.2.149 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0707654105 · DOI
- D Birkett, Clearance of drugs by the kidneys. Aust Prescriber 15, 16–19 (1992).
- 10.1007/s12274-009-9009-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.ki.5002317 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00259-007-0519-x · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M109959200 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0377-0257(02)00171-4 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1730994 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.281.4.F579 · DOI
- WM Deen, CR Bridges, BM Brenner, BD Myers, Heteroporous model of glomerular size selectivity: Application to normal and nephrotic humans. Am J Physiol 249, F374–F389 (1985).
- 10.1152/physrev.00055.2006 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.281.1.F103 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-201X.1998.0316f.x · DOI
- 10.1021/ar900035f · DOI
- 10.1021/ja043061w · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0609265103 · DOI
- 10.1038/nnano.2008.68 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.08.011 · DOI
- 10.1021/nl061160x · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt0708-774 · DOI
- 10.1021/nn800461u · DOI
- K Milton Scattering of Light and Other Electromagnetic Radiation (Academic Press, New York, 1997).
- 10.1021/mp800078a · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent Advances in Tumor Targeting via EPR Effect for Cancer Treatment
Subhan, M. A., Yalamarty, S. S. K., Filipczak, N., Parveen, F., & Torchilin, V. P. (2021) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm11060571 · Cited by 623
Delivery of Molecular and Nanoscale Medicine to Tumors: Transport Barriers and Strategies
Chauhan, V. P., Stylianopoulos, T., Boucher, Y., & Jain, R. K. (2011) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114300 · Cited by 597
Breaking Down the Barriers to Precision Cancer Nanomedicine
von Roemeling, C., Jiang, W., Chan, C. K., Weissman, I. L., & Kim, B. Y. S. (2017) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.07.006 · Cited by 330
Huang, J., Xie, C., Zhang, X., Jiang, Y., Li, J., Fan, Q., & Pu, K. (2019) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201909560 · Cited by 258
Particle toxicology and health - where are we?
Riediker, M., Zink, D., Kreyling, W., Oberdörster, G., Elder, A., Graham, U., Lynch, I., Duschl, A., Ichihara, G., Ichihara, S., et al. (2019) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-019-0302-8 · Cited by 237
Yao, C., Chen, Y., Zhao, M., Wang, S., Wu, B., Yang, Y., Yin, D., Yu, P., Zhang, H., & Zhang, F. (2022) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202114273 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruggiero, A., Villa, C. H., Bander, E., Rey, D. A., Bergkvist, M., Batt, C. A., Manova-Todorova, K., Deen, W. M., Scheinberg, D. A., & McDevitt, M. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-06-21
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 12369-12374
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review