Cited by 658Modular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceAdvanced Materials and MechanicsSoft Robotics and Applications

Programmable matter by folding

Open access
Hawkes, E., An, B., Benbernou, N. M., Tanaka, H., Kim, S., Demaine, E. D., Rus, D., Wood, R. J.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Programmable matter is a material whose properties can be programmed to achieve specific shapes or stiffnesses upon command. This concept requires constituent elements to interact and rearrange intelligently in order to meet the goal. This paper considers achieving programmable sheets that can form themselves in different shapes autonomously by folding. Past approaches to creating transforming machines have been limited by the small feature sizes, the large number of components, and the associated complexity of communication among the units. We seek to mitigate these difficulties through the unique concept of self-folding origami with universal crease patterns. This approach exploits a single sheet composed of interconnected triangular sections. The sheet is able to fold into a set of predetermined shapes using embedded actuation. To implement this self-folding origami concept, we have developed a scalable end-to-end planning and fabrication process. Given a set of desired objects, the system computes an optimized design for a single sheet and multiple controllers to achieve each of the desired objects. The material, called programmable matter by folding, is an example of a system capable of achieving multiple shapes for multiple functions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0914069107

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proposal is conservative-it does not require specific directional information at hinges, temporal staging, or using nonflat sheets.

    “Thus, our proposal is conservative—it does not require specific directional information at hinges6, temporal staging45, or using nonflat sheets37.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawkes, E., An, B., Benbernou, N. M., Tanaka, H., Kim, S., Demaine, E. D., Rus, D., & Wood, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-06-28
Volume
107
Issue
28
Pages
12441-12445
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1980587781
Cited by
658
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 20
FWCI
50.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
programmable matter
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Models, Theoretical, Robotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review