Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrophilic tuning of the chemoprotective natural product sulforaphane

Open access
Ahn, Young-Hoon, Hwang, Yousang, Liu, Hua, Wang, Xiu Jun, Zhang, Ying, Stephenson, Katherine K., Boronina, Tatiana N., Cole, Robert N., Dinkova-Kostova, Albena T., Talalay, Paul, Cole, Philip A.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Sulforaphane [1-isothiocyanato-4-(methylsulfinyl)butane], a naturally occurring isothiocyanate derived from cruciferous vegetables, is a highly potent inducer of phase 2 cytoprotective enzymes and can protect against electrophiles including carcinogens, oxidative stress, and inflammation. The mechanism of action of sulforaphane is believed to involve modifications of critical cysteine residues of Keap1, which lead to stabilization of Nrf2 to activate the antioxidant response element of phase 2 enzymes. However, the dithiocarbamate functional group formed by a reversible reaction between isothiocyanate of sulforaphane and sulfhydryl nucleophiles of Keap1 is kinetically labile, and such modification in intact cells has not yet been demonstrated. Here we designed sulforaphane analogs with replacement of the reactive isothiocyanate by the more gentle electrophilic sulfoxythiocarbamate group that also selectively targets cysteine residues in proteins but forms stable thiocarbamate adducts. Twenty-four sulfoxythiocarbamate analogs were synthesized that retain the structural features important for high potency in sulforaphane analogs: the sulfoxide or keto group and its appropriate distance to electrophilic functional group. Evaluation in various cell lines including hepatoma cells, retinal pigment epithelial cells, and keratinocytes as well as in mouse skin shows that these analogs maintain high potency and efficacy for phase 2 enzyme induction as well as the inhibitory effect on lipopolysaccharide-induced nitric oxide formation like sulforaphane. We further show in living cells that a sulfoxythiocarbamate analog can label Keap1 on several key cysteine residues as well as other cellular proteins offering new insights into the mechanism of chemoprotection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1004104107

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Ahn, Y.-H., Hwang, Y., Liu, H., Wang, X. J., Zhang, Y., Stephenson, K. K., Boronina, T. N., Cole, R. N., Dinkova-Kostova, A. T., Talalay, P., & Cole, P. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-05-03
Volume
107
Issue
21
Pages
9590-9595
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2062898287
Cited by
169
References
5
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophilic tuning of the chemoprotective natural product sulforaphane. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1004104107
The paper
Ahn, Y.-H., Hwang, Y., Liu, H., Wang, X. J., Zhang, Y., Stephenson, K. K., Boronina, T. N., Cole, R. N., Dinkova-Kostova, A. T., Talalay, P., & Cole, P. A. (2010). Electrophilic tuning of the chemoprotective natural product sulforaphane. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004104107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.