Cited by 238Evolution and Paleontology StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyMorphological variations and asymmetry

Encephalization is not a universal macroevolutionary phenomenon in mammals but is associated with sociality

Open access
Shultz, Susanne, Dunbar, Robin·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Evolutionary encephalization, or increasing brain size relative to body size, is assumed to be a general phenomenon in mammals. However, despite extensive evidence for variation in both absolute and relative brain size in extant species, there have been no explicit tests of patterns of brain size change over evolutionary time. Instead, allometric relationships between brain size and body size have been used as a proxy for evolutionary change, despite the validity of this approach being widely questioned. Here we relate brain size to appearance time for 511 fossil and extant mammalian species to test for temporal changes in relative brain size over time. We show that there is wide variation across groups in encephalization slopes across groups and that encephalization is not universal in mammals. We also find that temporal changes in brain size are not associated with allometric relationships between brain and body size. Furthermore, encephalization trends are associated with sociality in extant species. These findings test a major underlying assumption about the pattern and process of mammalian brain evolution and highlight the role sociality may play in driving the evolution of large brains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1005246107

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding that mosaic changes contribute more to explaining neural system diversity across species than changes in relative brain size confirms that the traditional focus on relative brain size significantly underestimates the contribution of different neural pathways to primate neural system diversity.

    “The finding that mosaic changes contribute more to explaining neural system diversity across species than changes in relative brain size confirms that the traditional focus on relative brain size [2,41–43] significantly underestimates the contribution of different neural pathways to primate neural system diversity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shultz, S., & Dunbar, R.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Shultz, Susanne
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-11-22
Volume
107
Issue
50
Pages
21582-21586
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2169266697
Cited by
238
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 40
FWCI
14.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Academy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
encephalization, brain size evolution, mammalian brain evolution, sociality, fossil mammals, social brain hypothesis, macroevolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Biological Evolution, Humans, Mammals, Organ Size, Phylogeny, Social Behavior, Body Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review