Cited by 207Evolution and Paleontology StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyMorphological variations and asymmetry

Comparative analysis of encephalization in mammals reveals relaxed constraints on anthropoid primate and cetacean brain scaling

Open access
BODDY, A. M., McGOWEN, M. R., SHERWOOD, C. C., GROSSMAN, L. I., GOODMAN, M., WILDMAN, D. E.·2012·Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Abstract

There is a well‐established allometric relationship between brain and body mass in mammals. Deviation of relatively increased brain size from this pattern appears to coincide with enhanced cognitive abilities. To examine whether there is a phylogenetic structure to such episodes of changes in encephalization across mammals, we used phylogenetic techniques to analyse brain mass, body mass and encephalization quotient (EQ) among 630 extant mammalian species. Among all mammals, anthropoid primates and odontocete cetaceans have significantly greater variance in EQ, suggesting that evolutionary constraints that result in a strict correlation between brain and body mass have independently become relaxed. Moreover, ancestral state reconstructions of absolute brain mass, body mass and EQ revealed patterns of increase and decrease in EQ within anthropoid primates and cetaceans. We propose both neutral drift and selective factors may have played a role in the evolution of brain–body allometry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02491.x

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The shift in brain:body allometry at the origin of crown cetaceans was largely due to changes in body mass development well after the move to aquatic habitats.

    “suggests the shift in brain:body allometry at the origin of crown cetaceans was largely due to changes in body mass development well after the move to aquatic habitats (Manger 2006;Boddy et al. 2012).”

    From THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF CETACEAN BRAIN AND BODY SIZE: CETACEAN BRAIN EVOLUTION (2013) · cites this paper as Boddy et al. 2012

    The ‘EQ within Primates and Cetartiodactyla’ section reports that increased mysticete body mass contributed to a change in relative brain size, but it also reports that odontocete brain mass increased substantially while body mass decreased only slightly. The ‘Adaptive explanations for variation in brain size’ section places high odontocete encephalization at least 10 million years after the adoption of a fully aquatic lifestyle. These passages do not establish that a shift at the origin of crown cetaceans was largely due to body-mass changes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Brain:body allometry in cetaceans differs significantly from other mammals.

    “This is of particular interest given evidence that brain:body allometry in cetaceans differs significantly from other mammals (Manger 2006;Boddy et al. 2012)”
  • The finding that mosaic changes contribute more to explaining neural system diversity across species than changes in relative brain size confirms that the traditional focus on relative brain size significantly underestimates the contribution of different neural pathways to primate neural system diversity.

    “The finding that mosaic changes contribute more to explaining neural system diversity across species than changes in relative brain size confirms that the traditional focus on relative brain size [2,41–43] significantly underestimates the contribution of different neural pathways to primate neural system diversity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [69]69. Paradis, E. 2006. Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, pp. 133-181.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BODDY, A. M., McGOWEN, M. R., SHERWOOD, C. C., GROSSMAN, L. I., GOODMAN, M., & WILDMAN, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
BODDY, A. M.
Venue
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Published
2012-03-21
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
981-994
ISSN
  • 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
  • 1420-9101
OpenAlex
W2167626357
Cited by
207
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Evolutionary Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0550209, 0827546)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
encephalization, brain-body allometry, encephalization quotient, anthropoid primates, ancestral state reconstruction, relaxed selection, cognitive evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Brain, Cetacea, Cognition, Biological Evolution, Organ Size, Phylogeny, Species Specificity, Time Factors, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review