CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 366Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural basis of the undermining effect of monetary reward on intrinsic motivation

Open access
Murayama, Kou, Matsumoto, Madoka, Izuma, Keise, Matsumoto, Kenji·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1013305107PMC PMC3000299
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Contrary to the widespread belief that people are positively motivated by reward incentives, some studies have shown that performance-based extrinsic reward can actually undermine a person's intrinsic motivation to engage in a task. This “undermining effect” has timely practical implications, given the burgeoning of performance-based incentive systems in contemporary society. It also presents a theoretical challenge for economic and reinforcement learning theories, which tend to assume that monetary incentives monotonically increase motivation. Despite the practical and theoretical importance of this provocative phenomenon, however, little is known about its neural basis. Herein we induced the behavioral undermining effect using a newly developed task, and we tracked its neural correlates using functional MRI. Our results show that performance-based monetary reward indeed undermines intrinsic motivation, as assessed by the number of voluntary engagements in the task. We found that activity in the anterior striatum and the prefrontal areas decreased along with this behavioral undermining effect. These findings suggest that the corticobasal ganglia valuation system underlies the undermining effect through the integration of extrinsic reward value and intrinsic task value.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1013305107

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. WS Grolnick The Psychology of Parental Control: How Well Mean Parenting Backfires (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 2003).
  2. C Hull Principles of Behavior (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1943).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–366 of 366

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Murayama, K., Matsumoto, M., Izuma, K., & Matsumoto, K.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Tamagawa University (JP)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-11-15
Volume
107
Issue
49
Pages
20911-20916
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1013305107
PMC
PMC3000299
OpenAlex
W2138816729
Cited by
365
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21530773)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
intrinsic motivation, extrinsic rewards, monetary rewards, performance-based incentives, neural basis, prefrontal cortex, reward valuation, task value, reinforcement learning
MeSH terms
Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Corpus Striatum, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review