The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Waddington's canalization revisited: Developmental stability and evolution
Open accessAbstract
Most species maintain abundant genetic variation and experience a range of environmental conditions, yet phenotypic variation is low. That is, development is robust to changes in genotype and environment. It has been claimed that this robustness, termed canalization, evolves because of long-term natural selection for optimal phenotypes. We show that the developmental process, here modeled as a network of interacting transcriptional regulators, constrains the genetic system to produce canalization, even without selection toward an optimum. The extent of canalization, measured as the insensitivity to mutation of a network's equilibrium state, depends on the complexity of the network, such that more highly connected networks evolve to be more canalized. We argue that canalization may be an inevitable consequence of complex developmental–genetic processes and thus requires no explanation in terms of evolution to suppress phenotypic variation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution
Kauffman, S. A. (1993) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195079517.001.0001 · Cited by 7,855
CANALIZATION OF DEVELOPMENT AND THE INHERITANCE OF ACQUIRED CHARACTERS
WADDINGTON, C. H. (1942) · Nature · doi:10.1038/150563a0 · Cited by 3,255
Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution
Rutherford, S. L., & Lindquist, S. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/24550 · Cited by 2,270
The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module
von Dassow, G., Meir, E., Munro, E. M., & Odell, G. M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35018085 · Cited by 1,144
Cited by
Kitano, H. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1471 · Cited by 2,278
Network thinking in ecology and evolution
PROULX, S., PROMISLOW, D., & PHILLIPS, P. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.004 · Cited by 936
Constraints on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity: limits and costs of phenotype and plasticity
Murren, C. J., Auld, J. R., Callahan, H., Ghalambor, C. K., Handelsman, C. A., Heskel, M. A., Kingsolver, J. G., Maclean, H. J., Masel, J., Maughan, H., et al. (2015) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2015.8 · Cited by 686
Deans, C., & Maggert, K. A. (2015) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.173492 · Cited by 554
Cryptic genetic variation: evolution's hidden substrate
Paaby, A. B., & Rockman, M. V. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3688 · Cited by 500
Metadata
- Authors
- Siegal, M. L., & Bergman, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-06-24
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 10528-10532
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2102216585
- Cited by
- 651
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Waddington's canalization revisited: Developmental stability and evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.102303999
- The paper
- Siegal, M. L., & Bergman, A. (2002). Waddington's canalization revisited: Developmental stability and evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.102303999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.