Cited by 134Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysHeat shock proteins research

Heterodimerization of Mdm2 and Mdm4 is critical for regulating p53 activity during embryogenesis but dispensable for p53 and Mdm2 stability

Open access
Pant, Vinod, Xiong, Shunbin, Iwakuma, Tomoo, Quintás-Cardama, Alfonso, Lozano, Guillermina·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Mdm2 and Mdm4 are homologous RING domain-containing proteins that negatively regulate the tumor suppressor p53 under physiological and stress conditions. The RING domain of Mdm2 encodes an E3-ubiquitin ligase that promotes p53 degradation. In addition, Mdm2 and Mdm4 interact through their respective RING domains. The in vivo significance of Mdm2-Mdm4 heterodimerization in regulation of p53 function is unknown. In this study, we generated an Mdm4 conditional allele lacking the RING domain to investigate its role in Mdm2 and p53 regulation. Our results demonstrate that homozygous deletion of the Mdm4 RING domain results in prenatal lethality. Mechanistically, Mdm2-Mdm4 heterodimerization is critical for inhibiting lethal p53 activation during early embryogenesis. However, Mdm2-Mdm4 interaction is dispensable for regulating p53 activity as well as the stability of Mdm2 and p53 at later stages of development. We propose that Mdm4 is a key cofactor of Mdm2 that inhibits p53 activity primarily during early embryogenesis but is dispensable for regulating p53 and Mdm2 stability in the adult mouse.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1102241108

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mice expressing Mdmx lacking or with mutant RING domain die in utero, and p53 deletion rescues this phenotype.

    “Mice engineered to express Mdmx lacking its RING domain or containing a mutant RING domain die in utero, and this phenotype was rescued with deletion of p53.50,51”
  • Mdm2 and Mdm4 interact through their RING domains, and this interaction is required for p53 inhibition.

    “Mdm2 and Mdm4 also interact with each other through their respective RING domains, and this interaction is essential for inhibition of p53 (Figure 1).”

    From The Mdm network and its regulation of p53 activities: a rheostat of cancer risk (2014) · cites this paper as Pant, et al., 2011

  • Hetero-oligomerization of MDM2 and MDMX via their RING domains is crucial for suppression of p53 activity during embryonic development.

    “Hetero-oligomerization of MDM2 and MDMX via their RING domains is crucial for the suppression of p53 activity during embryonic development17,18.”

    From MDM2, MDMX and p53 in oncogenesis and cancer therapy (2013) · cites this paper as [18]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pant, V., Xiong, S., Iwakuma, T., Quintás-Cardama, A., & Lozano, G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Departments of aGenetics and
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-07-05
Volume
108
Issue
29
Pages
11995-12000
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2066163561
Cited by
134
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 18
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA47296)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA47296, CA 009299, T32CA009299, R01CA047296)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
Keywords
MDM2, MDM4, p53, heterodimerization, RING domain, embryonic development, prenatal lethality, p53 stabilization, E3 ubiquitin ligase, tumor suppressor regulation, conditional alleles
MeSH terms
Animals, Cesium Radioisotopes, Genotype, Mice, Transgenic, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Blotting, Southern, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, DNA Primers, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Embryonic Development, Mice, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2, Ubiquitination, Protein Multimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review