Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

p63–microRNA feedback in keratinocyte senescence

Open access
Rivetti di Val Cervo, Pia, Lena, Anna Maria, Nicoloso, Milena, Rossi, Simona, Mancini, Mara, Zhou, Huiqing, Saintigny, Gaelle, Dellambra, Elena, Odorisio, Teresa, Mahé, Christian, Calin, George Adrian, Candi, Eleonora, Melino, Gerry·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We investigated the expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) associated with replicative senescence in human primary keratinocytes. A cohort of miRNAs up-regulated in senescence was identified by genome-wide miRNA profiling, and their change in expression was validated in proliferative versus senescent cells. Among these, miRNA (miR)-138, -181a, -181b, and -130b expression increased with serial passages. miR-138, -181a, and -181b, but not miR-130b, overexpression in proliferating cells was sufficient per se to induce senescence, as evaluated by inhibition of BrdU incorporation and quantification of senescence-activated β-galactosidase staining. We identified Sirt1 as a direct target of miR-138, -181a, and -181b, whereas ΔNp63 expression was inhibited by miR-130b. We also found that ΔNp63α inhibits miR-138, -181a, -181b, and -130b expression by binding directly to p63-responsive elements located in close proximity to the genomic loci of these miRNAs in primary keratinocytes. These findings suggest that changes in miRNA expression, by modulating the levels of regulatory proteins such as p63 and Sirt1, strongly contribute to induction of senescence in primary human keratinocytes, thus linking these two proteins. Our data also indicate that suppression of miR-138, -181a, -181b, and -130b expression is part of a growth-promoting strategy of ΔNp63α in epidermal proliferating cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1112257109

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Rivetti di Val Cervo, P., Lena, A. M., Nicoloso, M., Rossi, S., Mancini, M., Zhou, H., Saintigny, G., Dellambra, E., Odorisio, T., Mahé, C., Calin, G. A., Candi, E., & Melino, G.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-01-06
Volume
109
Issue
4
Pages
1133-1138
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2085857119
Cited by
182
References
11
FWCI
12.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: p63–microRNA feedback in keratinocyte senescence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1112257109
The paper
Rivetti di Val Cervo, P., Lena, A. M., Nicoloso, M., Rossi, S., Mancini, M., Zhou, H., Saintigny, G., Dellambra, E., Odorisio, T., Mahé, C., Calin, G. A., Candi, E., & Melino, G. (2012). p63–microRNA feedback in keratinocyte senescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112257109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.