Cited by 211Morphological variations and asymmetryForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Global human mandibular variation reflects differences in agricultural and hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies

Open access
von Cramon-Taubadel, Noreen·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Variation in the masticatory behavior of hunter-gatherer and agricultural populations is hypothesized to be one of the major forces affecting the form of the human mandible. However, this has yet to be analyzed at a global level. Here, the relationship between global mandibular shape variation and subsistence economy is tested, while controlling for the potentially confounding effects of shared population history, geography, and climate. The results demonstrate that the mandible, in contrast to the cranium, significantly reflects subsistence strategy rather than neutral genetic patterns, with hunter-gatherers having consistently longer and narrower mandibles than agriculturalists. These results support notions that a decrease in masticatory stress among agriculturalists causes the mandible to grow and develop differently. This developmental argument also explains why there is often a mismatch between the size of the lower face and the dentition, which, in turn, leads to increased prevalence of dental crowding and malocclusions in modern postindustrial populations. Therefore, these results have important implications for our understanding of human masticatory adaptation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1113050108

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main mode of subsistence in modern human populations is recognized as playing an important role in shaping the face, with masticatory stress particularly affecting the mandible and lower face.

    “The main mode of subsistence in modern human populations (i.e.agricultural vs non-agricultural diet; plant-based vs meat-based diet) is recognized as playing an important role in shaping the face, with masticatory stress particularly affecting the mandible and lower face 6,69,70”

    From The evolutionary history of the human face (2019) · cites this paper as [69]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Cramon-Taubadel, N.
Affiliations
Department of Anthropology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, United Kingdom
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-11-21
Volume
108
Issue
49
Pages
19546-19551
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2118550539
Cited by
211
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Keywords
hunter-gatherers, agricultural population, subsistence strategies, masticatory stress, dental crowding, malocclusion
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Diet, Biological Evolution, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Mandible, Models, Anatomic, Sex Factors, Skull, Stomatognathic System, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review