Cited by 66Morphological variations and asymmetryForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

The contribution of subsistence to global human cranial variation

Noback, Marlijn L., Harvati, Katerina·2015·Journal of Human Evolution

Abstract

Diet-related cranial variation in modern humans is well documented on a regional scale, with ample examples of cranial changes related to the agricultural transition. However, the influence of subsistence strategy on global cranial variation is less clear, having been confirmed only for the mandible, and dietary effects beyond agriculture are often neglected. Here we identify global patterns of subsistence-related human cranial shape variation. We analysed a worldwide sample of 15 populations (n = 255) with known subsistence strategies using 3-D landmark datasets designed to capture the shape of different units of the cranium. Results show significant correlations between global cranial shape and diet, especially for temporalis muscle shape and general cranial shape. Importantly, the differences between populations with either a plant- or an animal-based diet are more pronounced than those between agriculturalists and hunter-gatherers, suggesting that the influence of diet as driver of cranial variation is not limited to Holocene transitions to agricultural subsistence. Dental arch shape did not correlate with subsistence pattern, possibly indicating the high plasticity of this region of the face in relation to age, disease and individual use of the dentition. Our results highlight the importance of subsistence strategy as one of the factors underlying the evolution of human geographic cranial variation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.11.005

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main mode of subsistence in modern human populations is recognized as playing an important role in shaping the face, with masticatory stress particularly affecting the mandible and lower face.

    “The main mode of subsistence in modern human populations (i.e.agricultural vs non-agricultural diet; plant-based vs meat-based diet) is recognized as playing an important role in shaping the face, with masticatory stress particularly affecting the mandible and lower face 6,69,70”

    From The evolutionary history of the human face (2019) · cites this paper as [70]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noback, M. L., & Harvati, K.
Affiliations
Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment (DE)
Corresponding author
Noback, Marlijn L.
Venue
Journal of Human Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
80
Pages
34-50
ISSN
0047-2484 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079621693
Cited by
66
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
12.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Human Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Leakey Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Keywords
cranial shape variation, subsistence strategies, diet, dental arch form, agricultural transformation, hunter-gatherers, plant-based diet, animal-based diet, regional variation
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Climate, Dental Arch, Diet, Biological Evolution, Geography, Humans, Mandible, Meat, Population Dynamics, Skull, Diet, Vegetarian

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review