Cited by 396Morphological variations and asymmetryForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesGenetic diversity and population structure

Human cranial anatomy and the differential preservation of population history and climate signatures

Open access
Harvati, Katerina, Weaver, Timothy D.·2006·The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology

Abstract

Cranial morphology is widely used to reconstruct evolutionary relationships, but its reliability in reflecting phylogeny and population history has been questioned. Some cranial regions, particularly the face and neurocranium, are believed to be influenced by the environment and prone to convergence. Others, such as the temporal bone, are thought to reflect more accurately phylogenetic relationships. Direct testing of these hypotheses was not possible until the advent of large genetic data sets. The few relevant studies in human populations have had intriguing but possibly conflicting results, probably partly due to methodological differences and to the small numbers of populations used. Here we use three‐dimensional (3D) geometric morphometrics methods to test explicitly the ability of cranial shape, size, and relative position/orientation of cranial regions to track population history and climate. Morphological distances among 13 recent human populations were calculated from four 3D landmark data sets, respectively reflecting facial, neurocranial, and temporal bone shape; shape and relative position; overall cranial shape; and centroid sizes. These distances were compared to neutral genetic and climatic distances among the same, or closely matched, populations. Results indicate that neurocranial and temporal bone shape track neutral genetic distances, while facial shape reflects climate; centroid size shows a weak association with climatic variables; and relative position/orientation of cranial regions does not appear correlated with any of these factors. Because different cranial regions preserve population history and climate signatures differentially, caution is suggested when using cranial anatomy for phylogenetic reconstruction. Anat Rec Part A, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ar.a.20395

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While facial morphology carries a neutral genetic or population history signal, it is more strongly affected by climatic conditions than other parts of the cranium, especially in high latitude populations.

    “while facial morphology does carry a neutral genetic or population history signal, it is more strongly affected by climatic conditions than other parts of the cranium, especially in high latitude populations 81,82,83”

    From The evolutionary history of the human face (2019) · cites this paper as [81]

  • The modern human cranium overall appears to be mainly shaped by neutral evolutionary processes, while the modern human face reflects both phylogenetic and environmental factors.

    “While the modern human cranium, overall, appears to be mainly shaped by neutral evolutionary processes [80][81][82] , the modern human face reflects both phylogenetic and environmental factors [81][82][83][84]”

    From The evolutionary history of the human face (2019) · cites this paper as [81]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harvati, K., & Weaver, T. D.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Corresponding author
Harvati, Katerina
Venue
The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-10-30
Volume
288A
Issue
12
Pages
1225-1233
ISSN
  • 1552-4884 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4892
OpenAlex
W2123428193
Cited by
396
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
FWCI
19.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Anatomical Record Part A Discoveries in Molecular Cellular and Evolutionary Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
head shape, demographic history, temporal bone, neurocranium, facial shape, centroid size, morphological convergence, phylogenetic inference, genetic distance, morphological distance, 3D geometric morphometrics
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Adult, Anthropology, Physical, Cephalometry, Climate, Biological Evolution, Face, Female, Genetics, Population, Humans, Male, Phylogeny, Skull, Temporal Bone, Genetic Variation, Reproducibility of Results, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review