Cited by 385Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsLiver physiology and pathology

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) is essential for cell division and suppression of DNA re-replication but not for liver regeneration

Open access
Diril, M. Kasim, Ratnacaram, Chandrahas Koumar, Padmakumar, V. C., Du, Tiehua, Wasser, Martin, Coppola, Vincenzo, Tessarollo, Lino, Kaldis, Philipp·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) is an archetypical kinase and a central regulator that drives cells through G2 phase and mitosis. Knockouts of Cdk2, Cdk3, Cdk4, or Cdk6 have resulted in viable mice, but the in vivo functions of Cdk1 have not been fully explored in mammals. Here we have generated a conditional-knockout mouse model to study the functions of Cdk1 in vivo. Ablation of Cdk1 leads to arrest of embryonic development around the blastocyst stage. Interestingly, liver-specific deletion of Cdk1 is well tolerated, and liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy is not impaired, indicating that regeneration can be driven by cell growth without cell division. The loss of Cdk1 does not affect S phase progression but results in DNA re-replication because of an increase in Cdk2/cyclin A2 activity. Unlike other Cdks, loss of Cdk1 in the liver confers complete resistance against tumorigenesis induced by activated Ras and silencing of p53.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1115201109

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diril, M. K., Ratnacaram, C. K., Padmakumar, V. C., Du, T., Wasser, M., Coppola, V., Tessarollo, L., & Kaldis, P.
Affiliations
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-02-21
Volume
109
Issue
10
Pages
3826-3831
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2079019214
Cited by
385
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
cyclin-dependent kinase 1, CDK1, cell division, DNA re-replication, liver regeneration, conditional knockout mice, embryonic development, S phase progression
MeSH terms
Animals, Blastocyst, Cell Cycle, Cell Division, DNA Replication, Liver Regeneration, Mitosis, Polyploidy, Genes, ras, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genes, p53, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, S Phase, CDC2 Protein Kinase, Mice, Knockout, ras Proteins, Gene Silencing, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review