Cited by 940Face Recognition and PerceptionCultural Differences and ValuesEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Facial expressions of emotion are not culturally universal

Open access
Jack, Rachael E., Garrod, Oliver G. B., Yu, Hui, Caldara, Roberto, Schyns, Philippe G.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Since Darwin’s seminal works, the universality of facial expressions of emotion has remained one of the longest standing debates in the biological and social sciences. Briefly stated, the universality hypothesis claims that all humans communicate six basic internal emotional states (happy, surprise, fear, disgust, anger, and sad) using the same facial movements by virtue of their biological and evolutionary origins [Susskind JM, et al. (2008) Nat Neurosci 11:843–850]. Here, we refute this assumed universality. Using a unique computer graphics platform that combines generative grammars [Chomsky N (1965) MIT Press, Cambridge, MA] with visual perception, we accessed the mind’s eye of 30 Western and Eastern culture individuals and reconstructed their mental representations of the six basic facial expressions of emotion. Cross-cultural comparisons of the mental representations challenge universality on two separate counts. First, whereas Westerners represent each of the six basic emotions with a distinct set of facial movements common to the group, Easterners do not. Second, Easterners represent emotional intensity with distinctive dynamic eye activity. By refuting the long-standing universality hypothesis, our data highlight the powerful influence of culture on shaping basic behaviors once considered biologically hardwired. Consequently, our data open a unique nature–nurture debate across broad fields from evolutionary psychology and social neuroscience to social networking via digital avatars.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1200155109

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has found that cultural factors influence how people express and perceive emotions particularly on the face, questioning the universality of human emotions.

    “Previous research has found that cultural factors influence how people express and perceive emotions particularly on the face, questioning the universality of human emotions (Jack et al., 2012;Nelson & Russell, 2013),”

    From Bodily maps of emotions are culturally universal (2020) · cites this paper as Jack et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jack, R. E., Garrod, O. G. B., Yu, H., Caldara, R., & Schyns, P. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-04-16
Volume
109
Issue
19
Pages
7241-7244
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2107114452
Cited by
940
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 11
FWCI
23.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MC_G1001214)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/E020933/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
emotional facial expressions, universality hypothesis, basic emotions, cross-cultural comparison, Eastern and Western cultures, generative grammar, eye movements, emotional intensity, nature versus nurture, cultural influence on behavior, avatars
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Cultural Characteristics, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Photic Stimulation, Surveys and Questionnaires, User-Computer Interface, Visual Perception, White People, Asian People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review