Cited by 466Cultural Differences and ValuesFace Recognition and PerceptionCategorization, perception, and language

Perceptions of emotion from facial expressions are not culturally universal: Evidence from a remote culture

Open access
Gendron, Maria, Roberson, Debi, van der Vyver, Jacoba Marietta, Barrett, Lisa Feldman·2014·Emotion

Abstract

It is widely believed that certain emotions are universally recognized in facial expressions. Recent evidence indicates that Western perceptions (e.g., scowls as anger) depend on cues to U.S. emotion concepts embedded in experiments. Because such cues are standard features in methods used in cross-cultural experiments, we hypothesized that evidence of universality depends on this conceptual context. In our study, participants from the United States and the Himba ethnic group from the Keunene region of northwestern Namibia sorted images of posed facial expressions into piles by emotion type. Without cues to emotion concepts, Himba participants did not show the presumed "universal" pattern, whereas U.S. participants produced a pattern with presumed universal features. With cues to emotion concepts, participants in both cultures produced sorts that were closer to the presumed "universal" pattern, although substantial cultural variation persisted. Our findings indicate that perceptions of emotion are not universal, but depend on cultural and conceptual contexts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0036052

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Tomkins SS Affect, Imagery, Consciousness 1962 Vol. 1 New York Springer
  2. Tomkins SS Affect, Imagery, Consciousness 1963 Vol. 2 New York Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gendron, M., Roberson, D., van der Vyver, J. M., & Barrett, L. F.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • University of Essex (GB)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2014
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
251-262
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W1975731691
Cited by
463
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5
FWCI
37.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (DP1OD003312)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
facial expressions, emotion perception, cultural universality, cross-cultural comparison, Himba, emotion concepts, emotion classification
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Namibia, Perception, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review