Cited by 226Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace recognition and analysis

Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces.

Todorov, Alexander, Dotsch, Ron, Porter, Jenny M., Oosterhof, Nikolaas N., Falvello, Virginia B.·2013·Emotion

Abstract

People rapidly form impressions from facial appearance, and these impressions affect social decisions. We argue that data-driven, computational models are the best available tools for identifying the source of such impressions. Here we validate seven computational models of social judgments of faces: attractiveness, competence, dominance, extroversion, likability, threat, and trustworthiness. The models manipulate both face shape and reflectance (i.e., cues such as pigmentation and skin smoothness). We show that human judgments track the models' predictions (Experiment 1) and that the models differentiate between different judgments, though this differentiation is constrained by the similarity of the models (Experiment 2). We also make the validated stimuli available for academic research: seven databases containing 25 identities manipulated in the respective model to take on seven different dimension values, ranging from -3 SD to +3 SD (175 stimuli in each database). Finally, we show how the computational models can be used to control for shared variance of the models. For example, even for highly correlated dimensions (e.g., dominance and threat), we can identify cues specific to each dimension and, consequently, generate faces that vary only on these cues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0032335

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of only male Caucasian faces means findings may not extend to female faces or faces from different ethnic backgrounds.

    “A second limitation was that we only used male Caucasian faces. This decision was made in the light of evidence that there is a bias to classify bald, hairless faces as males (Todorov et al., 2013); thus, it is possible that our findings may not extend to females faces as well as faces from different ethnic backgrounds.”

    From Mistrust and negative self‐esteem: Two paths from attachment styles to paranoia. (2021) · cites this paper as Todorov et al., 2013

  • The choice of using intelligence, trustworthiness, sociability and happiness as dependent attributes for the halo effect was driven by existing literature.

    “The choice of using intelligence, trustworthiness, sociability and happiness as dependent attributes for the halo effect was driven by existing literature on this cognitive bias, such as [4,6,8,9,22,53,60–63].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Todorov, A., Dotsch, R., Porter, J. M., Oosterhof, N. N., & Falvello, V. B.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Trento (IT)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2013-08
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
724-738
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2140051380
Cited by
226
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
face perception, computational model, model validation, facial attractiveness, perceived competence, perceived dominance, likeability, threat perception, perceived trustworthiness, facial shape, pigmentation, skin smoothness, face database
MeSH terms
Adult, Computer Simulation, Cues, Face, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Social Perception, Databases, Factual, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review