Cited by 187Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Functional anatomy of neural circuits regulating fear and extinction

Open access
Knapska, Ewelina, Macias, Matylda, Mikosz, Marta, Nowak, Aleksandra, Owczarek, Dorota, Wawrzyniak, Marcin, Pieprzyk, Marcelina, Cymerman, Iwona A. +5 more·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The memory of fear extinction is context dependent: fear that is suppressed in one context readily renews in another. Understanding of the underlying neuronal circuits is, therefore, of considerable clinical relevance for anxiety disorders. Prefrontal cortical and hippocampal inputs to the amygdala have recently been shown to regulate the retrieval of fear memories, but the cellular organization of these projections remains unclear. By using anterograde tracing in a transgenic rat in which neurons express a dendritically-targeted PSD-95:Venus fusion protein under the control of a c- fos promoter, we found that, during the retrieval of extinction memory, the dominant input to active neurons in the lateral amygdala was from the infralimbic cortex, whereas the retrieval of fear memory was associated with greater hippocampal and prelimbic inputs. This pattern of retrieval-related afferent input was absent in the central nucleus of the amygdala. Our data show functional anatomy of neural circuits regulating fear and extinction, providing a framework for therapeutic manipulations of these circuits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1202087109

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The expression and inhibition of learned fear is largely regulated by the amygdala, hippocampus, and PFC in adult rodents and humans.

    “The expression and inhibition of learned fear is largely regulated by the amygdala, hippocampus, and PFC in adult rodents and humans (Knapska et al., 2012;LeDoux, 2003;Maren and Quirk, 2004;Tovote et al., 2015)”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Knapska et al., 2012

    The introduction identifies the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex as the three main structures involved in auditory fear extinction and describes their differing effects on fear expression. The Methods identify the study subjects as rats. The paper notes clinical relevance to human anxiety disorders but does not establish the claimed regulation in humans (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pitkänen A, Pikkarainen M, Nurminen N, Ylinen A (2000) Reciprocal connections between the amygdala and the hippocampal formation, perirhinal cortex, and postrhinal cortex in rat. A review. Ann N Y Acad Sci 911:369-391.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knapska, E., Macias, M., Mikosz, M., Nowak, A., Owczarek, D., Wawrzyniak, M., Pieprzyk, M., Cymerman, I. A., Werka, T., Sheng, M., Maren, S., Jaworski, J., & Kaczmarek, L.
Affiliations
  • Departments of aNeurophysiology and
  • Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego (PL)
  • International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (PL)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-10
Volume
109
Issue
42
Pages
17093-17098
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2120495407
Cited by
187
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH065961)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
fear extinction, fear memory, neural circuits, lateral amygdala, infralimbic cortex, hippocampus, prelimbic cortex, central amygdala, memory retrieval, anxiety disorders, c-fos, anterograde tracing, contextual memory
MeSH terms
Disks Large Homolog 4 Protein, Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Conditioning, Psychological, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Immunohistochemistry, Limbic System, Luminescent Proteins, Male, Membrane Proteins, Memory, Neural Pathways, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Video Recording, DNA Primers, Microscopy, Confocal, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Rats, Rats, Transgenic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review