Cited by 303Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Fear and safety engage competing patterns of theta-gamma coupling in the basolateral amygdala

Open access
Stujenske, Joseph M., Likhtik, Ekaterina, Topiwala, Mihir A., Gordon, Joshua A.·2014·Neuron

Abstract

Theta oscillations synchronize the basolateral amygdala (BLA) with the hippocampus (HPC) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) during fear expression. The role of gamma-frequency oscillations in the BLA is less well characterized. We examined gamma- and theta-frequency activity in recordings of neural activity from the BLA-HPC-mPFC circuit during fear conditioning, extinction, and exposure to an open field. In the BLA, slow (40-70 Hz) and fast (70-120 Hz) gamma oscillations were coupled to distinct phases of the theta cycle and reflected synchronous high-frequency unit activity. During periods of fear, BLA theta-fast gamma coupling was enhanced, while fast gamma power was suppressed. Periods of relative safety were associated with enhanced BLA fast gamma power, mPFC-to-BLA directionality, and strong coupling of BLA gamma to mPFC theta. These findings suggest that switches between states of fear and safety are mediated by changes in BLA gamma coupling to competitive theta frequency inputs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.026

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stujenske, J. M., Likhtik, E., Topiwala, M. A., & Gordon, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Gordon, Joshua A.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
919-933
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980487320
Cited by
303
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH096891, F32MH088103, R01MH081968)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
theta-gamma coupling, basolateral amygdala, fear, safety, fear extinction, hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, gamma oscillations, theta oscillations, neural oscillations, neuronal synchronization
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Psychological, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Hippocampus, Male, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Safety, Theta Rhythm, Prefrontal Cortex, Mice, Gamma Rhythm, Basolateral Nuclear Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review