Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain conditioning is instrumental for successful microglia reconstitution following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Capotondo, Alessia, Milazzo, Rita, Politi, Letterio Salvatore, Quattrini, Angelo, Palini, Alessio, Plati, Tiziana, Merella, Stefania, Nonis, Alessandro, di Serio, Clelia, Montini, Eugenio, Naldini, Luigi, Biffi, Alessandra·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The recent hypothesis that postnatal microglia are maintained independently of circulating monocytes by local precursors that colonize the brain before birth has relevant implications for the treatment of various neurological diseases, including lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs), for which hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is applied to repopulate the recipient myeloid compartment, including microglia, with cells expressing the defective functional hydrolase. By studying wild-type and LSD mice at diverse time-points after HCT, we showed the occurrence of a short-term wave of brain infiltration by a fraction of the transplanted hematopoietic progenitors, independently from the administration of a preparatory regimen and from the presence of a disease state in the brain. However, only the use of a conditioning regimen capable of ablating functionally defined brain-resident myeloid precursors allowed turnover of microglia with the donor, mediated by local proliferation of early immigrants rather than entrance of mature cells from the circulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1205858109

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.06.010 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/jnr.20488 · DOI · Paper page
  3. AR Simard S Rivest Bone marrow stem cells have the ability to populate the entire central nervous system into fully differentiated parenchymal microglia. FASEB J 18:998–1000. (2004). · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nm1201-1356 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1172/JCI200419205 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nn2014 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703839 · DOI
  8. 10.1056/NEJMoa032613 · DOI
  9. 10.1056/NEJMoa042604 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/096368979500400409 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s00330-010-1773-z · DOI
  12. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0037 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03891.x · DOI
  14. GR Westerhof, et al., Comparison of different busulfan analogues for depletion of hematopoietic stem cells and promotion of donor-type chimerism in murine bone marrow transplant recipients. Cancer Res 60, 5470–5478 (2000).
  15. AL Ford, AL Goodsall, WF Hickey, JD Sedgwick, Normal adult ramified microglia separated from other central nervous system macrophages by flow cytometric sorting. Phenotypic differences defined and direct ex vivo antigen presentation to myelin basic protein-reactive CD4+ T cells compared. J Immunol 154, 4309–4321 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/glia.20896 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s11481-009-9163-5 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.07.001 · DOI
  19. 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1189 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nn.2887 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14821 · DOI
  22. 10.1172/JCI28873 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Capotondo, A., Milazzo, R., Politi, L. S., Quattrini, A., Palini, A., Plati, T., Merella, S., Nonis, A., di Serio, C., Montini, E., Naldini, L., & Biffi, A.
Affiliations
  • San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy, Division of Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cells and Gene Therapy,
  • Imaging Core,
  • Division of Neuroscience,
  • Flow Cytometry Resource Analytical Cytology Technical Applications Laboratory, and
  • Center of Biostatistics, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-08-23
Volume
109
Issue
37
Pages
15018-15023
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
200
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review