Cited by 349

Microglial cell activation and proliferation precedes the onset of CNS autoimmunity

Ponomarev, Eugene D., Shriver, Leah P., Maresz, Katarzyna, Dittel, Bonnie N.·2005·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

Microglial cells are central nervous system (CNS) resident cells that are thought to become activated and contribute to the inflammation that occurs in the human autoimmune disease multiple sclerosis (MS). This has never been proven, however, because microglial cells cannot be phenotypically distinguished from peripheral macrophages that accumulate in MS inflammatory lesions. To study the kinetics and nature of microglial cell activation in the CNS, we used the animal model of MS, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), and induced EAE in bone marrow (BM) chimera mice generated using major histocompatibility complex (MHC)‐mismatched donor BM, allowing the separation of microglial cells and peripheral monocytes/macrophages. We found that microglial cell activation was evident before onset of disease symptoms and infiltration of peripheral myeloid cells into the CNS. Activated microglial cells underwent proliferation and upregulated the expression of CD45, MHC class II, CD40, CD86, and the dendritic cell marker CD11c. At the peak of EAE disease, activated microglial cells comprised 37% of the total macrophage and dendritic cell populations and colocalized with infiltrating leukocytes in inflammatory lesions. Our findings thus definitively demonstrate that during EAE, microglial cells become activated early in EAE disease and then differentiate into both macrophages and dendritic‐like cells, suggesting they play an active role in the pathogenesis of EAE and MS. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.20488

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study acknowledges that CD11b+F4/80+ cells may include small numbers of myeloid dendritic cells and that peripheral macrophages may be contaminated by small numbers of GFP+ microglia.

    “In this study, we refer to cells expressing CD11b+F4/80+ as ‘macrophages’ even though they may include small numbers of CD11b+CD11c+F4/80+ myeloid dendritic cells. Peripheral macrophages may also be contaminated by small numbers of GFP+ microglia that enter the CNS during reconstitution14.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ponomarev, E. D., Shriver, L. P., Maresz, K., & Dittel, B. N.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06-15
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
374-389
ISSN
  • 0360-4012
  • 1097-4547
Cited by
349
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review