The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical regulation of miR-200/ZEB2 pathway in Oct4/Sox2-induced mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition and induced pluripotent stem cell generation
Abstract
Fibroblasts can be reprogrammed to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by application of transcription factors octamer-binding protein 4 (Oct4), SRY-box containing gene 2 (Sox2), Kruppel-like factor 4 (Klf4), and c-Myelocytomatosis oncogene (c-Myc) (OSKM), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we report that exogenous Oct4 and Sox2 can bind at the promoter regions of mir-141/200c and mir-200a/b/429 cluster, respectively, and induce the transcription activation of miR-200 family during the OSKM-induced reprogramming. Functional suppression of miR-200s with specific inhibitors significantly represses the OSKM-caused mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET, an early event in reprogramming of fibroblasts to iPSCs) and iPSC generation, whereas overexpression of miR-200s promotes the MET and iPSC generation. Mechanistic studies showed that miR-200s significantly repress the expression of zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2 (ZEB2) through directly targeting its 3′ UTR and direct inhibition of ZEB2 can mimic the effects of miR-200s on iPSC generation and MET process. Moreover, the effects of miR-200s during iPSC generation can be blocked by ZEB2 overexpression. Collectively, our findings not only reveal that members of the miR-200 family are unique mediators of the reprogramming factors Oct4/Sox2, but also demonstrate that the miR-200/ZEB2 pathway as one critical mechanism of Oct4/Sox2 to induce somatic cell reprogramming at the early stage.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
OSKM facilitates MET by suppressing the regulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through multiple mechanisms, such as OCT4 and MYC repression of TGFβ signaling, OCT4 and SOX2 activation of miR-200 family, and OCT4 and KLF4 chromatin opening and activation of epithelial genes.
“Interestingly, OSKM facilitates MET by suppressing the regulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through multiple mechanisms, such as OCT4 and MYC repression of TGFβ signaling 33,94 , OCT4 and SOX2 activation of miR-200 family 33,98 , and OCT4 and KLF4 chromatin opening and activation of epithelial genes 37 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [98]
Citations
Cites
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells
Yu, J., Vodyanik, M. A., Smuga-Otto, K., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J., Frane, J. L., Tian, S., Nie, J., Jonsdottir, G. A., Ruotti, V., Stewart, R., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151526 · Cited by 10,310
Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: An alliance against the epithelial phenotype?
Peinado, H., Olmeda, D., & Cano, A. (2007) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2131 · Cited by 3,121
Disease-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Park, I.-H., Arora, N., Huo, H., Maherali, N., Ahfeldt, T., Shimamura, A., Lensch, M. W., Cowan, C., Hochedlinger, K., & Daley, G. Q. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.041 · Cited by 2,196
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1073/pnas.0711983105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature05944 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.stem.2009.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05934 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08267 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrm2466 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06534 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.011 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.1502 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb1722 · DOI
- 10.4161/cc.7.20.6851 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.1640608 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/stem.628 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb2173 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkr731 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035 · DOI · Paper page
- S Griffiths-Jones, miRBase: The microRNA sequence database. Methods Mol Biol 342, 129–138 (2006).
- 10.1038/embor.2008.74 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.C800074200 · DOI
- 10.4161/cc.8.6.7907 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1942 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.020 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.00359-08 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.1535 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkq850 · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2009.254 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb1998 · DOI
- 10.4161/cbt.10.3.12548 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.023 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.274.29.20489 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00260-X · DOI
- 10.1002/ijc.27708 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470151808.sc04a04s20 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming
Cipriano, A., Moqri, M., Maybury-Lewis, S. Y., Rogers-Hammond, R., de Jong, T. A., Parker, A., Rasouli, S., Schöler, H. R., Sinclair, D. A., & Sebastiano, V. (2023) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00539-2 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, G., Guo, X., Hong, W., Liu, Q., Wei, T., Lu, C., Gao, L., Ye, D., Zhou, Y., Chen, J., Wang, J., Wu, M., Liu, H., & Kang, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-02-05
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2858-2863
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review