Cited by 2,436

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors

Park, In-Hyun, Zhao, Rui, West, Jason A., Yabuuchi, Akiko, Huo, Hongguang, Ince, Tan A., Lerou, Paul H., Lensch, M. William, Daley, George Q.·2008·Nature

Abstract

Pluripotency pertains to the cells of early embryos that can generate all of the tissues in the organism. Embryonic stem cells are embryo-derived cell lines that retain pluripotency and represent invaluable tools for research into the mechanisms of tissue formation. Recently, murine fibroblasts have been reprogrammed directly to pluripotency by ectopic expression of four transcription factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and Myc) to yield induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. Using these same factors, we have derived iPS cells from fetal, neonatal and adult human primary cells, including dermal fibroblasts isolated from a skin biopsy of a healthy research subject. Human iPS cells resemble embryonic stem cells in morphology and gene expression and in the capacity to form teratomas in immune-deficient mice. These data demonstrate that defined factors can reprogramme human cells to pluripotency, and establish a method whereby patient-specific cells might be established in culture.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature06534

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Wakayama, T. et al. Differentiation of embryonic stem cell lines generated from adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer. Science 292, 740–743 (2001) · DOI
  2. Cowan, C. A., Atienza, J., Melton, D. A. & Eggan, K. Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells after fusion with human embryonic stem cells. Science 309, 1369–1373 (2005) · DOI
  3. Kanatsu-Shinohara, M. et al. Generation of pluripotent stem cells from neonatal mouse testis. Cell 119, 1001–1012 (2004) · DOI · Paper page
  4. Wernig, M. et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448, 318–324 (2007) · DOI
  5. Okita, K., Ichisaka, T. & Yamanaka, S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448, 313–317 (2007) · DOI
  6. Maherali, N. et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1, 55–70 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  7. Zwaka, T. P. & Thomson, J. A. Homologous recombination in human embryonic stem cells. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 319–321 (2003) · DOI
  8. Watanabe, K. et al. A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nature Biotechnol. 25, 681–686 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Meissner, A., Wernig, M. & Jaenisch, R. Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells. Nature Biotechnol. 25, 1177–1181 (2007) · DOI
  10. Blelloch, R., Venere, M., Yen, J. & Ramalho-Santos, M. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of drug selection. Cell Stem Cell 1, 245–247 (2007) · DOI
  11. Adewumi, O. et al. Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the International Stem Cell Initiative. Nature Biotechnol. 25, 803–816 (2007) · DOI
  12. Tada, M., Takahama, Y., Abe, K., Nakatsuji, N. & Tada, T. Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells by in vitro hybridization with ES cells. Curr. Biol. 11, 1553–1558 (2001) · DOI
  13. Lensch, M. W., Schlaeger, T. M., Zon, L. I. & Daley, G. Q. Teratoma formation assays with human embryonic stem cells: a rationale for one type of human-animal chimera. Cell Stem Cell 1, 253–258 (2007) · DOI
  14. Lensch, M. W. & Ince, T. A. The terminology of teratocarcinomas and teratomas. Nature Biotechnol. 25, 1211 (2007) · DOI
  15. Xu, C., Police, S., Rao, N. & Carpenter, M. K. Characterization and enrichment of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Circ. Res. 91, 501–508 (2002) · DOI
  16. Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  17. Van Parijs, L. et al. Uncoupling IL-2 signals that regulate T cell proliferation, survival, and Fas-mediated activation-induced cell death. Immunity 11, 281–288 (1999) · DOI
  18. Eischen, C. M., Roussel, M. F., Korsmeyer, S. J. & Cleveland, J. L. Bax loss impairs Myc-induced apoptosis and circumvents the selection of p53 mutations during Myc-mediated lymphomagenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 7653–7662 (2001) · DOI
  19. Deb-Rinker, P., Ly, D., Jezierski, A., Sikorska, M. & Walker, P. R. Sequential DNA methylation of the Nanog and Oct-4 upstream regions in human NT2 cells during neuronal differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 6257–6260 (2005) · DOI
  20. Freberg, C. T., Dahl, J. A., Timoskainen, S. & Collas, P. Epigenetic reprogramming of OCT4 and NANOG regulatory regions by embryonal carcinoma cell extract. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 1543–1553 (2007) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Park, I.-H., Zhao, R., West, J. A., Yabuuchi, A., Huo, H., Ince, T. A., Lerou, P. H., Lensch, M. W., & Daley, G. Q.
Venue
Nature
Published
2007-12-23
Volume
451
Issue
7175
Pages
141-146
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
Cited by
2,436
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review