The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reversal of age-related neural timing delays with training
Open accessAbstract
Neural slowing is commonly noted in older adults, with consequences for sensory, motor, and cognitive domains. One of the deleterious effects of neural slowing is impairment of temporal resolution; older adults, therefore, have reduced ability to process the rapid events that characterize speech, especially in noisy environments. Although hearing aids provide increased audibility, they cannot compensate for deficits in auditory temporal processing. Auditory training may provide a strategy to address these deficits. To that end, we evaluated the effects of auditory-based cognitive training on the temporal precision of subcortical processing of speech in noise. After training, older adults exhibited faster neural timing and experienced gains in memory, speed of processing, and speech-in-noise perception, whereas a matched control group showed no changes. Training was also associated with decreased variability of brainstem response peaks, suggesting a decrease in temporal jitter in response to a speech signal. These results demonstrate that auditory-based cognitive training can partially restore age-related deficits in temporal processing in the brain; this plasticity in turn promotes better cognitive and perceptual skills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · Cited by 25,553
Music training for the development of auditory skills
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2882 · Cited by 1,115
Self-citationSmith, G. E., Housen, P., Yaffe, K., Ruff, R., Kennison, R. F., Mahncke, H. W., & Zelinski, E. M. (2009) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02167.x · Cited by 785
Brain plasticity through the life span: Learning to learn and action video games
Bavelier, D., Green, C. S., Pouget, A., & Schrater, P. (2012) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152832 · Cited by 541
Cholinergic Neurotransmission Is Essential for Perirhinal Cortical Plasticity and Recognition Memory
Warburton, E. C., Koder, T., Cho, K., Massey, P. V., Duguid, G., Barker, G. R. I., Aggleton, J. P., Bashir, Z. I., & Brown, M. W. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00358-1 · Cited by 226
Cited by
Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response
Coffey, E. B. J., Nicol, T., White-Schwoch, T., Chandrasekaran, B., Krizman, J., Skoe, E., Zatorre, R. J., & Kraus, N. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13003-w · Cited by 207
Self-citationTetlow, A. M., & Edwards, J. D. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Enhancement · doi:10.1007/s41465-017-0051-2 · Cited by 69
The mechanisms of far transfer from cognitive training: Review and hypothesis.
Greenwood, P. M., & Parasuraman, R. (2016) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000235 · Cited by 62
Aging and speech understanding
Lee, J. Y. (2015) · Journal of Audiology and Otology · doi:10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.7 · Cited by 51
Effects of Fast Simple Numerical Calculation Training on Neural Systems
Takeuchi, H., Nagase, T., Taki, Y., Sassa, Y., Hashizume, H., Nouchi, R., & Kawashima, R. (2016) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2016/5940634 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, S., White-Schwoch, T., Parbery-Clark, A., & Kraus, N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-02-11
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4357-4362
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2066175052
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
