Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inflammatory monocytes and Fcγ receptor IV on osteoclasts are critical for bone destruction during inflammatory arthritis in mice

Open access
Seeling, Michaela, Hillenhoff, Ulrike, David, Jean Pierre, Schett, Georg, Tuckermann, Jan, Lux, Anja, Nimmerjahn, Falk·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Destruction of bone tissue by osteoclasts represents a severe pathological phenotype during inflammatory arthritis and results in joint pain and bone malformations. Previous studies have established the essential role of cytokines including TNFα and receptor–ligand interactions, such as the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B–receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand interaction for osteoclast formation during joint inflammation. Moreover, autoantibodies contribute to joint inflammation in inflammatory arthritis by triggering cellular fragment crystallizable (Fc)γ receptors (FcγR), resulting in the release of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines essential for recruitment and activation of innate immune effector cells. In contrast, little is known about the expression pattern and function of different FcγRs during osteoclast differentiation. This would allow osteoclasts to directly interact with autoantibody immune complexes, rather than being influenced indirectly via proinflammatory cytokines released upon immune complex binding to other FcγR-expressing innate immune cells. To address this question, we studied FcγR expression and function on osteoclasts during the steady state and during acute joint inflammation in a model of inflammatory arthritis. Our results suggest that osteoclastogenesis is directly influenced by IgG autoantibody binding to select activating FcγRs on immature osteoclasts, resulting in enhanced osteoclast generation and, ultimately, bone destruction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1301001110

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Seeling, M., Hillenhoff, U., David, J. P., Schett, G., Tuckermann, J., Lux, A., & Nimmerjahn, F.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-06-10
Volume
110
Issue
26
Pages
10729-10734
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2167213128
Cited by
171
References
4
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inflammatory monocytes and Fcγ receptor IV on osteoclasts are critical for bone destruction during inflammatory arthritis in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1301001110
The paper
Seeling, M., Hillenhoff, U., David, J. P., Schett, G., Tuckermann, J., Lux, A., & Nimmerjahn, F. (2013). Inflammatory monocytes and Fcγ receptor IV on osteoclasts are critical for bone destruction during inflammatory arthritis in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301001110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.