Cited by 208Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Functional and structural architecture of the human dorsal frontoparietal attention network

Open access
Szczepanski, Sara M., Pinsk, Mark A., Douglas, Malia M., Kastner, Sabine, Saalmann, Yuri B.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Everyday actions require us to represent attentional priorities in different reference frames. For example, to pick up a cup of coffee, we need to know where the cup is relative to our body, and where the handle is relative to the cup (i.e., body-centered and object-centered reference frames). Multiple brain areas in frontal and parietal cortex help process attentional priorities. Although these areas are commonly conceptualized as an attentional network, it is not clear what neural pathways connect these areas, nor the pathways’ functions. We demonstrate that two pathways link these areas in frontal and parietal cortex. The pathways help represent attentional priorities in different reference frames, enabling us to flexibly interact with objects in our environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1313903110

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A network including the IPS and surrounding areas and involving primarily the FEF has been identified as the dorsal frontoparietal network or dorsal attention network; this network may also expand to include the PMV or corresponding areas such as the inferior frontal junction.

    “A network including the IPS and surrounding areas and involving primarily the FEF has been identified as the dorsal frontoparietal network or dorsal attention network (Corbetta and Shulman 2002; Szczepanski et al. 2013); this network may also expand to include the PMV or corresponding areas, such as the inferior frontal junction (Toro et al. 2008; Corbetta and Shulman 2011; Gordon et al. 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szczepanski, S. M., Pinsk, M. A., Douglas, M. M., Kastner, S., & Saalmann, Y. B.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Electrical Engineering and
  • Departments of aPsychology and
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-09-09
Volume
110
Issue
39
Pages
15806-15811
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1981481309
Cited by
208
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01ey017699-14)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH64043, R01MH064043)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY-017699, R21EY021078)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Keywords
spatial attention, attentional control, spatial representation, frontoparietal connectivity, functional architecture
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Parietal Lobe, Visual Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review