Cited by 355Bacteriophages and microbial interactionsGut microbiota and healthEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Gnotobiotic mouse model of phage–bacterial host dynamics in the human gut

Open access
Reyes, Alejandro, Wu, Meng, McNulty, Nathan P., Rohwer, Forest L., Gordon, Jeffrey I.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: A consortium of sequenced human gut bacteria was introduced into germ-free mice followed by a “staged” phage attack with virus-like particles purified from the fecal microbiota of five healthy adult humans. Unique phages were identified attacking microbiota members in nonsimultaneous fashion. Some host bacterial species acquired resistance to phage attack through ecological or epigenetic mechanisms. Changes in community structure observed after attack were transient. Spontaneous induction of prophages present in seven bacterial taxa was modest, occurring independently of the phage attack. Together, these results reveal a largely temperate phage–bacterial host dynamic and illustrate how gnotobiotic mouse models can help characterize ecological relationships in the gut by taking into account its most abundant but least understood component, viruses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1319470110

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gnotobiotic systems allow precise control of microbial composition, enabling dissection of how specific bacteria influence phage pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and therapeutic efficacy.

    “These systems allow precise control of microbial composition, enabling the dissection of how specific bacteria influence phage pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and therapeutic efficacy.”

    From Phage therapy in oncology: opportunities for cancer prevention and treatment (2026) · cites this paper as [118]

    The Abstract describes a defined 15-member bacterial community used to study phage–bacterial dynamics. The section “Nonsimultaneous Detection of Viruses and Community Rearrangements” reports phage persistence and distribution across gut segments, but does not establish how specific bacteria affect phage pharmacokinetics or biodistribution. The paper mentions candidate therapeutic agents; it does not test therapeutic efficacy. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Gnotobiotic mice provide unparalleled mechanistic insight into phage-bacteria-host immunity interactions.

    “Given the interplay between phages, bacteria, and host immunity, gnotobiotic mice provide unparalleled mechanistic insight [20,118]”

    From Phage therapy in oncology: opportunities for cancer prevention and treatment (2026) · cites this paper as [118]

    The Prospectus describes gnotobiotic mice as a tractable, more realistic-than-in-vitro system for characterizing phage–bacterial dynamics. The Results and Discussion report immune measurements only to check for differences between treatment groups; they do not establish mechanistic insight into interactions with host immunity. The paper also does not support the stronger claim that the insight is 'unparalleled.' Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Rodriguez-Brito B, et al. (2010) Viral and microbial community dynamics in four aquatic environments. ISME J 4(6):739-751.
  2. Faith JJ, et al. (2013) The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota. Science 341(6141):1237439.
  3. Reyes A, et al. (2010) Viruses in the faecal microbiota of monozygotic twins and their mothers. Nature 466(7304):334-338.
  4. Breitbart M, et al. (2008) Viral diversity and dynamics in an infant gut. Res Microbiol 159(5):367-373.
  5. Minot S, et al. (2013) Rapid evolution of the human gut virome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(30):12450-12455.
  6. Mello LV, Chen X, Rigden DJ (2010) Mining metagenomic data for novel domains: BACON, a new carbohydrate-binding module. FEBS Lett 584(11):2421-2426.
  7. Barrangou R, et al. (2007) CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315(5819):1709-1712.
  8. Krupovic M, Forterre P (2011) Microviridae goes temperate: Microvirus-related pro- viruses reside in the genomes of Bacteroidetes. PLoS ONE 6(5):e19893.
  9. Roux S, Krupovic M, Poulet A, Debroas D, Enault F (2012) Evolution and diversity of the Microviridae viral family through a collection of 81 new complete genomes as- sembled from virome reads. PLoS ONE 7(7):e40418.
  10. Kashyap PC, et al. (2013) Complex interactions among diet, gastrointestinal transit, and gut microbiota in humanized mice. Gastroenterology 144(5):967-977.
  11. Minot S, Grunberg S, Wu GD, Lewis JD, Bushman FD (2012) Hypervariable loci in the human gut virome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(10):3962-3966.
  12. Barr JJ, et al. (2013) Bacteriophage adhering to mucus provide a non-host-derived immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(26):10771-10776.
  13. Vaishnava S, et al. (2011) The antibacterial lectin RegIIIgamma promotes the spatial segregation of microbiota and host in the intestine. Science 334(6053):255-258.
  14. Martens EC, et al. (2011) Recognition and degradation of plant cell wall poly- saccharides by two human gut symbionts. PLoS Biol 9(12):e1001221.
  15. Koropatkin NM, Cameron EA, Martens EC (2012) How glycan metabolism shapes the human gut microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol 10(5):323-335.
  16. Goodman AL, et al. (2009) Identifying genetic determinants needed to establish a human gut symbiont in its habitat. Cell Host Microbe 6(3):279-289.
  17. Goodman AL, Wu M, Gordon JI (2011) Identifying microbial fitness determinants by insertion sequencing using genome-wide transposon mutant libraries. Nat Protoc 6(12):1969-1980.
  18. Henthorn KS, Friedman DI (1995) Identification of related genes in phages phi 80 and P22 whose products are inhibitory for phage growth in Escherichia coli IHF mutants. J Bacteriol 177(11):3185-3190.
  19. Ptashne M (1986) . A Genetic Switch: Gene Control and Phage Lambda (Cell Press and Blackwell Scientific Publications, Palo Alto, CA) p 128.
  20. Crowl RM, Boyce RP, Echols H (1981) Repressor cleavage as a prophage induction mechanism: Hypersensitivity of a mutant lambda cI protein to recA-mediated pro- teolysis. J Mol Biol 152(4):815-819.
  21. Weiss M, et al. (2009) In vivo replication of T4 and T7 bacteriophages in germ-free mice colonized with Escherichia coli. Virology 393(1):16-23.
  22. Duerkop BA, Clements CV, Rollins D, Rodrigues JL, Hooper LV (2012) A composite bacteriophage alters colonization by an intestinal commensal bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(43):17621-17626.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reyes, A., Wu, M., McNulty, N. P., Rohwer, F. L., & Gordon, J. I.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-11-20
Volume
110
Issue
50
Pages
20236-20241
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2057460314
Cited by
355
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 2
FWCI
18.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America
  • Crohn's and Colitis Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (DK078669)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R37DK030292, DK-30292, DK078669, P01DK078669, DK078669S1, R01DK030292)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
bacteriophages, phage-bacteria interactions, gut microbiota, gnotobiotic mice, germ-free mice, prophages, Bacteroides cellulosilyticus, phage resistance, virus-like particles, transposon mutants, host fitness
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteroides, Base Sequence, Cell Count, Feces, Flow Cytometry, Germ-Free Life, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Genetic Variation, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Primers, Models, Animal, Prophages, Gastrointestinal Tract, Mice, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review