Cited by 355Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsEvolution and Paleontology StudiesOrigins and Evolution of Life

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 31 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Oxygen requirements of the earliest animals

Open access

Abstract

A rise in the oxygen content of the atmosphere and oceans is one of the most popular explanations for the relatively late and abrupt appearance of animal life on Earth. In this scenario, Earth's surface environment failed to meet the high oxygen requirements of animals up until the middle to late Neoproterozoic Era (850-542 million years ago), when oxygen concentrations sufficiently rose to permit the existence of animal life for the first time. Although multiple lines of geochemical evidence support an oxygenation of the Ediacaran oceans (635-542 million years ago), roughly corresponding with the first appearance of metazoans in the fossil record, the oxygen requirements of basal animals remain unclear. Here we show that modern demosponges, serving as analogs for early animals, can survive under low-oxygen conditions of 0.5-4.0% present atmospheric levels. Because the last common ancestor of metazoans likely exhibited a physiology and morphology similar to that of a modern sponge, its oxygen demands may have been met well before the enhanced oxygenation of the Ediacaran Period. Therefore, the origin of animals may not have been triggered by a contemporaneous rise in the oxygen content of the atmosphere and oceans. Instead, other ecological and developmental processes are needed to adequately explain the origin and earliest evolution of animal life on Earth.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1400547111

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

3 of 31 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 26 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 15
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 3
18 of 18
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The minimum oxygen requirements of modern sponges and their metabolic response to low oxygen had not been investigated prior to this study.

    “Despite these observations, however, the minimum oxygen requirements of modern sponges and their metabolic response to low oxygen have not, to our knowledge, been investigated.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. N Boury-Esnault, L de Vos, C Donadey, J Vacelet Ultrastructure of Choanosome and Sponge Classification (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC), pp. 237–244 (1990).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 354

Metadata

Authors
Mills, D. B., Ward, L. M., Jones, C., Sweeten, B., Forth, M., Treusch, A. H., & Canfield, D. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-02-18
Volume
111
Issue
11
Pages
4168-4172
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2029322624
Cited by
355
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 11
FWCI
22.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agouron Institute
  • National Research Foundation
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (Grant DNRF 53, DNRF 53)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
Keywords
origin of animals, Ediacaran, oxygen requirement, demosponges, low oxygen tolerance, atmospheric oxygenation, Neoproterozoic, animal evolution
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Animals, Atmosphere, Base Sequence, Denmark, Biological Evolution, Kinetics, Molecular Sequence Data, Oxygen, Oxygen Consumption, Porifera, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review