Cited by 263Climate Change and Health ImpactsClimate change impacts on agricultureChild Nutrition and Water Access

Systematic review of current efforts to quantify the impacts of climate change on undernutrition

Open access
Phalkey, Revati K., Aranda-Jan, Clara, Marx, Sabrina, Höfle, Bernhard, Sauerborn, Rainer·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Malnutrition is a challenge to the health and productivity of populations and is viewed as one of the five largest adverse health impacts of climate change. Nonetheless, systematic evidence quantifying these impacts is currently limited. Our aim was to assess the scientific evidence base for the impact of climate change on childhood undernutrition (particularly stunting) in subsistence farmers in low- and middle-income countries. A systematic review was conducted to identify peer-reviewed and gray full-text documents in English with no limits for year of publication or study design. Fifteen manuscripts were reviewed. Few studies use primary data to investigate the proportion of stunting that can be attributed to climate/weather variability. Although scattered and limited, current evidence suggests a significant but variable link between weather variables, e.g., rainfall, extreme weather events (floods/droughts), seasonality, and temperature, and childhood stunting at the household level (12 of 15 studies, 80%). In addition, we note that agricultural, socioeconomic, and demographic factors at the household and individual levels also play substantial roles in mediating the nutritional impacts. Comparable interdisciplinary studies based on primary data at a household level are urgently required to guide effective adaptation, particularly for rural subsistence farmers. Systemization of data collection at the global level is indispensable and urgent. We need to assimilate data from long-term, high-quality agricultural, environmental, socioeconomic, health, and demographic surveillance systems and develop robust statistical methods to establish and validate causal links, quantify impacts, and make reliable predictions that can guide evidence-based health interventions in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1409769112

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kaufmann S (2008) The Nutrition Situation in Northern Laos-Determinants of Mal- nutrition and Changes After Four Years of Intensive Interventions. PhD thesis (Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phalkey, R. K., Aranda-Jan, C., Marx, S., Höfle, B., & Sauerborn, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-07-27
Volume
112
Issue
33
Pages
E4522-9
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1750617262
Cited by
263
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
climate change impacts, child undernutrition, stunting, subsistence farmers, low- and middle-income countries, rainfall variability, extreme weather events, drought, floods, temperature, seasonal variation, socioeconomic factors, climate change adaptation, data collection system
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Child, Child, Preschool, Climate, Decision Making, Environment, Growth Disorders, Humans, Social Class, Weather, Global Health, Crops, Agricultural, Malnutrition, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review