Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuromolecular responses to social challenge: Common mechanisms across mouse, stickleback fish, and honey bee

Rittschof, Clare C., Bukhari, Syed Abbas, Sloofman, Laura G., Troy, Joseph M., Caetano-Anollés, Derek, Cash-Ahmed, Amy, Kent, Molly, Lu, Xiaochen, Sanogo, Yibayiri O., Weisner, Patricia A., Zhang, Huimin, Bell, Alison M., Ma, Jian, Sinha, Saurabh, Robinson, Gene E., Stubbs, Lisa·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: In some cases similar molecular programs (i.e., conserved genes and gene networks) underlie the expression of phenotypic traits that evolve repeatedly across diverse species. We investigated this possibility in the context of social behavioral response, using a comparative genomics approach for three distantly related species: house mouse ( Mus musculus ), stickleback fish ( Gasterosteus aculeatus ), and honey bee ( Apis mellifera ). An experience of territory intrusion modulated similar brain functional processes across species, including hormone-mediated signal transduction, neurodevelopment, chromosome organization, and energy metabolism. Several homologous transcription factors also responded consistently to territory intrusion, suggesting that shared neuronal effects may involve transcriptional cascades of evolutionarily conserved genes. These results indicate that conserved genetic “toolkits” are involved in independent evolutions of social behavior.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1420369111

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199802)20:2<116::AID-BIES4>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Rittschof, C. C., Bukhari, S. A., Sloofman, L. G., Troy, J. M., Caetano-Anollés, D., Cash-Ahmed, A., Kent, M., Lu, X., Sanogo, Y. O., Weisner, P. A., Zhang, H., Bell, A. M., Ma, J., Sinha, S., Robinson, G. E., & Stubbs, L.
Affiliations
Institute for Genomic Biology,
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-12
Volume
111
Issue
50
Pages
17929-17934
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
163
References
80
Language
en
Funders
Simons Foundation (SF) (291812)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuromolecular responses to social challenge: Common mechanisms across mouse, stickleback fish, and honey bee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1420369111
The paper
Rittschof, C. C., Bukhari, S. A., Sloofman, L. G., Troy, J. M., Caetano-Anollés, D., Cash-Ahmed, A., Kent, M., Lu, X., Sanogo, Y. O., Weisner, P. A., Zhang, H., Bell, A. M., Ma, J., Sinha, S., Robinson, G. E., & Stubbs, L. (2014). Neuromolecular responses to social challenge: Common mechanisms across mouse, stickleback fish, and honey bee. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420369111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.