The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ongoing dynamics in large-scale functional connectivity predict perception
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Most brain activity is not directly evoked by specific external events. This ongoing activity is correlated across distant brain regions within large-scale networks. This correlation or functional connectivity may reflect communication across brain regions. Strength and spatial organization of functional connectivity changes dynamically over seconds to minutes. Using functional MRI, we show that these ongoing changes correlate with behavior. The connectivity state before playback of a faint sound predicted whether the participant was going to perceive the sound on that trial. Connectivity states preceding missed sounds showed weakened modular structure, in which connectivity was more random and less organized across brain regions. These findings suggest that ongoing brain connectivity dynamics contribute to explaining behavioral variability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Finding and evaluating community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.69.026113 · Cited by 13,931
Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 · Cited by 11,675
Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain
Power, J. D., Cohen, A. L., Nelson, S. M., Wig, G. S., Barnes, K. A., Church, J. A., Vogel, A. C., Laumann, T. O., Miezin, F. M., Schlaggar, B. L., et al. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.006 · Cited by 4,124
Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks
Guimerà, R., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03288 · Cited by 3,983 · cited 1×
“participation coefficient (36) are in SI Text, section 8.”
BackgroundBuckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691
Modular and hierarchically modular organization of brain networks
Meunier, D., Lambiotte, R., & Bullmore, E. T. (2010) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2010.00200 · Cited by 1,156
Baseline brain activity fluctuations predict somatosensory perception in humans
Boly, M., Balteau, E., Schnakers, C., Degueldre, C., Moonen, G., Luxen, A., Phillips, C., Peigneux, P., Maquet, P., & Laureys, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611404104 · Cited by 529
Cognitive emissions of 1/f noise.
Gilden, D. L. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.33 · Cited by 516
Cited by
The role of PFC networks in cognitive control and executive function
Menon, V., & D’Esposito, M. (2022) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01152-w · Cited by 654
Self-citationQuestions and controversies in the study of time-varying functional connectivity in resting fMRI
Lurie, D. J., Kessler, D., Bassett, D. S., Betzel, R. F., Breakspear, M., Kheilholz, S., Kucyi, A., Liégeois, R., Lindquist, M. A., McIntosh, A. R., et al. (2020) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00116 · Cited by 648
Northoff, G., & Lamme, V. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.019 · Cited by 247
Northoff, G., & Huang, Z. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.013 · Cited by 229
Douw, L., Wakeman, D. G., Tanaka, N., Liu, H., & Stufflebeam, S. M. (2016) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.09.034 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadaghiani, S., Poline, J.-B., Kleinschmidt, A., & D’Esposito, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2015-06-23
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 8463-8468
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1495993332
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
