Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 78

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Propagation of aggregated p53: Cross-reaction and coaggregation vs. seeding

Wang, GuoZhen, Fersht, Alan R.·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Aggregation of tumor suppressor p53 oncogenic mutants not only loses their activity but may also lead to gain of oncogenic function, possibly by coaggregation with other proteins. We explored how a destabilized p53 mutant may coaggregate with WT p53 and its homologs p63 and p73. The results are explained by the simple two-step initiation mechanism we proposed. Rather than the oncogenic mutant seeding coaggregation by a prion-like process, coaggregation results from the simultaneous unfolding and cross-reaction of WT and mutant molecules. Consequently, preformed p53 aggregate displays little seeding of aggregation of p53, and high concentrations of p53 mutants are required to trap WT p53 into aggregate. Coaggregation is predominantly by trapping rather than seeding and induced propagation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1500262112

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1073/pnas.1500243112 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90635-4 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)00049-4 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1073/pnas.1211550109 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1073/pnas.1211557109 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/nar/gkq800 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nchembio.546 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2563 · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2563
  10. 10.1128/mcb.11.1.12-19.1991 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.0905867106 · DOI
  12. 10.1128/MCB.21.5.1874-1887.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1074/jbc.M201405200 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1074/jbc.M003360200 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1073/pnas.0907840106 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.bpc.2011.04.006 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203434 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047889 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1073/pnas.0705069104 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.03.047 · DOI
  21. 10.1074/jbc.M604209200 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1074/jbc.M108815200 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207396 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1897 · DOI
  25. 10.1021/bi002555c · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/nchembio.635 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.0710152105 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1096/fj.99-1078rev · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206505 · DOI
  30. 10.1128/MCB.19.2.1438 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1038/75586 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210311 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1073/pnas.0805326105 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 78

Metadata

Authors
Wang, G., & Fersht, A. R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-02-09
Volume
112
Issue
8
Pages
2443-2448
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
78
References
1
Language
en
Funders
EC | European Research Council (268506)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Propagation of aggregated p53: Cross-reaction and coaggregation vs. seeding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1500262112
The paper
Wang, G., & Fersht, A. R. (2015). Propagation of aggregated p53: Cross-reaction and coaggregation vs. seeding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500262112

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.