Cited by 157Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural mechanisms of social decision-making in the primate amygdala

Open access
Chang, Steve W. C., Fagan, Nicholas A., Toda, Koji, Utevsky, Amanda V., Pearson, John M., Platt, Michael L.·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Making social decisions requires evaluation of benefits and costs to self and others. Long associated with emotion and vigilance, neurons in primate amygdala also signal reward and punishment as well as information about the faces and eyes of others. Here we show that neurons in the basolateral amygdala signal the value of rewards for self and others when monkeys make social decisions. These value-mirroring neurons reflected monkeys’ tendency to make prosocial decisions on a momentary as well as long-term basis. We also found that delivering the social peptide oxytocin into basolateral amygdala enhances both prosocial tendencies and attention to the recipients of prosocial decisions. Our findings endorse the amygdala as a critical neural nexus regulating social decisions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1514761112

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.2307/258391 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–156 of 156

Metadata

Authors
Chang, S. W. C., Fagan, N. A., Toda, K., Utevsky, A. V., Pearson, J. M., & Platt, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-12-14
Volume
112
Issue
52
Pages
16012-16017
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2217623521
Cited by
157
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11
FWCI
24.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (R00-MH099093, R01-MH095894)
  • DOD | Army Research Office (W81XWH-11-1-0584)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No number)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (K01-ES-025442)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
social decision-making, amygdala, basolateral amygdala, oxytocin, dictator game, prosocial behavior, reward valuation, punishment, social preferences, neuromodulation, primate social behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Choice Behavior, Cues, Decision Making, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Markov Chains, Models, Neurological, Monte Carlo Method, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Oxytocics, Oxytocin, Reward, Social Behavior, Basolateral Nuclear Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review